基于装备体系韧性的作战网络链路重要度评估及恢复策略

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.01.17

Abstract

Abstract:

Resilience can comprehensively describe the ability of equipment system-of-systems (SoS) to absorb or recover from strikes or interferences, reflecting the comprehensive performance of the SoS. A computational evaluation method is proposed to assess the resilience quantitatively and to evaluate the importance of combat network links of equipment SoS. Firstly, the definition of equipment SoS resilience is provided and a mathematical model for quantifying resilience is established. Secondly, a link importance index based on the resilience-added value is proposed to recognize critical links and a combat network link importance evaluation model is constructed accordingly. Thirdly, various recovery strategies are presented and their effects on the performance recovery of combat network are analyzed. Finally, the applicability and rationality of the proposed method is verified via a simulation case. Experimental results demonstrate the theoretical contribution of the paper to the architecture optimization of equipment SoS, which ensures and improves the combat performance of SoS. Also, this research lays a critical foundation for further research on relevant combat network applications based on the equipment SoS resilience.

Key words: equipment system-of-systems (ESoS), resilience, combat network, link importance evaluation, recovery strategy

CLC Number:

E917

Renjie XU, Lin GONG, Jian XIE, Xin LIU, Kewei YANG. Operation network link importance evaluation and recovery strategy based on equipment system-of-systems resilience[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(1): 139-147.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.6

Table 4

Fig.7

References 33

1	周琛, 尚柏林, 宋笔锋, 等. 基于作战环的航空武器装备体系贡献率评估[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 51 (8): 16- 26.
	ZHOU C , SHANG B L , SONG B F , et al. Aviation armament system of systems contribution evaluation based on operation loop[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 51 (8): 16- 26.
2	LI J C , JIANG J , YANG K W , et al. Research on functional robustness of heterogeneous combat networks[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2019, 13 (2): 1487- 1495. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2018.2828779
3	LUBAS D G. Department of defense system of systems reliability challenges[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2014.
4	SCOTT V , DUNN R . A prototype method to rate the link vulnerability of strategic rural roads[J]. Road and Transport Research, 2015, 24 (2): 3- 12.
5	GWAK Y , KIM J H , KIM J Y , et al. Comparison of vulnerabi-lity analysis and live fire test and evaluation of weapon system components using COVART[J]. Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2020, 44 (11): 795- 803. doi: 10.3795/KSME-A.2020.44.11.795
6	PATRIARCA R , BERGSTRÖM J , GRAVIO G D , et al. Resi-lience engineering: current status of the research and future challenges[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 102 (2): 79- 100.
7	LIU W , SONG Z Y . Review of studies on the resilience of urban critical infrastructure networks[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2020, 193, 106617. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106617
8	石建伟, 刘俊先, 姜志平, 等. 基于超网络的军事体系韧性评估[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2017, 3 (3): 213- 217.
	SHI J W , LIU J X , JIANG Z P , et al. Evaluating military system of systems resilience using super networks[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2017, 3 (3): 213- 217.
9	丁峰, 周芳, 赵鑫, 等. Cyber攻击下韧性信息服务云环境能力评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40 (12): 2722- 2728.
	DING F , ZHOU F , ZHAO X , et al. Evaluating the capability for resilient information service cloud environment under Cyberattack condition[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40 (12): 2722- 2728.
10	PAN X , WANG H X , YANG Y J , et al. Resilience based importance measure analysis for SoS[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 30 (5): 920- 930. doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2019.05.10
11	刘涛, 白光晗, 陶俊勇, 等. 面向任务的复杂系统韧性评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (4): 1003- 1011.
	LIU T , BAI G H , TAO J Y , et al. Mission-oriented resilience evaluation method for complex system[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (4): 1003- 1011.
12	李际超, 杨克巍, 张小可, 等. 基于武器装备体系作战网络模型的装备贡献度评估[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2016, 13 (3): 1- 7.
	LI J C , YANG K W , ZHANG X K , et al. Equipment contribution degree evaluation method based on combat network of weapon system-of-systems[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2016, 13 (3): 1- 7.
13	WAN C P , YANG Z L , ZHANG D , et al. Resilience in trans portation systems: a systematic review and future directions[J]. Transport Reviews, 2018, 38 (4): 479- 498. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2017.1383532
14	CIMELLARO G P , REINHORN A M , BRUNEAU M . Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience[J]. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32 (11): 3639- 3649.
15	HOLLIN C S . Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4 (4): 1- 23.
16	WOODS D D . Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering[J]. Reliability Engi-neering & System Safety, 2015, 141, 5- 9.
17	HOSSEINI S , IVANOV D , DOLGUI A . Review of quantitative methods for supply Chain resilience analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2019, 125, 285- 307.
18	ZHOU Y M , WANG J W , YANG H . Resilience oftransportation systems: concepts and comprehensivereview[J]. IEEE Trans.on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019, 20 (12): 4262- 4276.
19	United States Department of Defense. Department of defense science and technology emphasis areas[R]. Washington DC: United States Department of Defense, 2011.
20	GEORGE W H , PATELLI E . Efficient availability assessment of reconfigurable systems with interdependencies[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2017, 165, 431- 444.
21	BUCHANAN K , GOERGER S R , RINAUDO C H , et al. Resilience in engineered resilient systems[J]. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology, 2020, 17 (4): 435- 446.
22	GOERGER S R , MADNI A M , ESLINGER O J . Engineered resilient systems: a DoD perspective[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2014, 28, 865- 872.
23	PAN X , WANG H X . Resilience of and recovery strategies for weighted networks[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13 (9): e0203894.
24	陈志伟, 王靖, 谷长超, 等. 考虑动态重构的装备体系可用性及弹性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (8): 2347- 2354.
	CHEN Z W , WANG J , GU C C , et al. Performance availability and resilience analysis of weapon system of systems considering dynamic reconfiguration[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (8): 2347- 2354.
25	吕彪, 管心怡, 高自强. 地铁网络服务韧性评估与最优恢复策略[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21 (2): 198- 205.
	LYU B , GUAN X Y , GAO Z Q . Evaluation and optimal recovery strategy of metro network service resilience[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21 (2): 198- 205.
26	LIU W , SONG Z Y , OUYANG M . Lifecycle operational resilience assessment of urban water distribution networks[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2020, 198, 106859.
27	CARES J R . An information age combat model[M]. Newport: Alidade Incorporated, 2004: 85- 90.
28	谭跃进, 张小可, 杨克巍. 武器装备体系网络化描述与建模方法[J]. 系统管理学报, 2012, 21 (6): 781- 786.
	TAN Y J , ZHANG X K , YANG K W . Research on networked description and modeling methods of armament system-of-systems[J]. Journal of Systems and Management, 2012, 21 (6): 781- 786.
29	穆中林, 于雷, 廖俊, 等. 编队对地攻击作战效能评估指标体系[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2011, 36 (1): 87- 89.
	MU Z L , YU L , LIAO J , et al. Research on the index system of operational effectiveness evaluation for formation attaching ground targets[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2011, 36 (1): 87- 89.
30	赵丹玲, 谭跃进, 李际超, 等. 基于作战环的武器装备体系贡献度评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39 (10): 2239- 2247.
	ZHAO D L , TAN Y J , LI J C , et al. Armament system of systems contribution evaluation based on operation loop[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39 (10): 2239- 2247.
31	WEN M L , CHEN Y B , YANG Y , et al. Resilience-based component importance measures[J]. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2020, 30 (11): 4244- 4254.
32	FANG Y P , PEDRONI N , ZIO E . Resilience-based component importance measures for critical in frastructure network systems[J]. IEEE Trans.on Reliability, 2016, 65 (2): 502- 512.
33	潘星, 蒋卓, 杨艳京. 基于弹性的体系组件重要度及恢复策略[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43 (9): 1713- 1720.
	PAN X , JIANG Z , YANG Y J . Resilience-based component importance and recovery strategy for system-of-systems[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017, 43 (9): 1713- 1720.

编号	链路	长度	编号	链路	长度
1	T→S₁	3	10	D₁→I₃	5
2	T→S₂	6	11	D₁→D₂	1
3	T→S₃	7	12	D₂→I₁	4
4	S₁→D₂	3	13	D₂→I₂	2
5	S₂→D₁	2	14	D₂→D₁	1
6	S₂→D₂	2	15	I₁→T	2
7	S₂→S₂	1	16	I₂→T	6
8	S₃→D₁	3	17	I₃→T	7
9	D₁→I₂	4	—	—	—

编号	链路	构成作战环数量	受到打击或干扰后的作战网络性能/%	链路重要度/%	排序
1	T→S₁	7	1.908	2.879	7
2	T→S₂	25	1.697	13.234	1
3	T→S₃	5	1.920	2.329	9
4	S₁→D₂	7	1.908	2.879	6
5	S₂→D₁	15	1.906	2.942	5
6	S₂→D₂	10	1.935	1.663	13
7	S₂→S₂	10	1.954	0.856	17
8	S₃→D₁	5	1.948	1.122	16
9	D₁→I₂	14	1.870	4.585	3
10	D₁→I₃	7	1.924	2.149	11
11	D₁→D₂	14	1.935	1.659	14
12	D₂→I₁	8	1.876	4.319	4
13	D₂→I₂	8	1.934	1.699	12
14	D₂→D₁	15	1.940	1.469	15
15	I₁→T	8	1.920	2.315	10
16	I₂→T	22	1.726	11.683	2
17	I₃→T	7	1.908	2.855	8

时间	RRS	MOLNFRS	MLIFRS
0	1.535	1.535	1.535
1	1.635	1.757	1.757
2	1.743	1.819	1.840
3	1.850	1.908	1.908
4	1.974	1.974	1.974
5	1.974	1.974	1.974

[1]	Zhiwei CHEN, Jing WANG, Changchao GU, Jianchun ZHANG, Jilong ZHONG. Performance availability and resilience analysis of weapon system of systems considering dynamic reconfiguration [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(8): 2347-2354.
[2]	Tao LIU, Guanghan BAI, Junyong TAO, Yunan ZHANG, Yining FANG. Mission-oriented resilience evaluation method for complex system [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(4): 1003-1011.
[3]	Lingfeng GU, Ming HE, Guoyou CHEN, Minhui JI, Jintao LIU. Research on unmanned aerial vehicle swarm system resilience [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(1): 156-162.
[4]	Mingchang SONG, Quan SHI, Zhifeng YOU, Lei LI, Cai CHEN. Evaluation method of resilience of battle damage parts under multiple information sources [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(11): 2538-2545.
[5]	PAN Xing, ZHANG Guozhong, ZHANG Yuedong, KANG Rui. Review of engineered resilient systems and system resilience theory [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(9): 2006-2015.
[6]	GE Bingfeng, LI Jichao, ZHAO Danling, YANG Kewei, TAN Yuejin. Meta-path based link prediction approach for weapon system-of-systems combat networks [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(5): 1028-1033.
[7]	MEI Xiaoyong, LI Shixian, HUANG Changqin, ZHENG Xiaolin, MING Zhong. Verification of failure recovery for composition transaction [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34(1): 191-198.

Operation network link importance evaluation and recovery strategy based on equipment system-of-systems resilience

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 33

Related Articles 7

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

编号	装备构成	作战环广义长度	作战环时间	作战环性能
1	T, S₁, D₂, I₁	12	12	0.402
2	T, S₁, D₂, I₂	14	14	0.379
3	T, S₂, D₁, I₂	18	18	0.346
4	T, S₂, D₁, I₂	18	18	0.346
5	T, S₂, D₁, I₃	20	20	0.334
6	T, S₂, D₁, I₂	18	18	0.346
7	T, S₂, D₁, I₂	18	18	0.346
8	T, S₂, D₁, I₃	20	20	0.334
9	T, S₃, D₁, I₂	20	20	0.334
10	T, S₃, D₁, I₂	20	20	0.334
11	T, S₃, D₁, I₃	22	22	0.324
12	T, S₂, S₂, D₁, I₂	19	19	0.340
13	T, S₂, S₂, D₁, I₂	19	19	0.340
14	T, S₂, S₂, D₁, I₃	21	21	0.328
15	T, S₁, D₂, D₁, I₂	17	17	0.353
16	T, S₁, D₂, D₁, I₂	17	17	0.353
17	T, S₁, D₂, D₁, I₃	19	19	0.340
18	T, S₂, D₂, D₁, I₂	19	19	0.340
19	T, S₂, D₂, D₁, I₂	19	19	0.340
20	T, S₂, D₂, D₁, I₃	21	21	0.328
21	T, S₂, D₁, D₂, I₃	15	15	0.369
22	T, S₂, D₁, D₂, I₂	17	17	0.353
23	T, S₂, D₁, D₂, I₁	15	15	0.369
24	T, S₂, D₁, D₂, I₂	17	17	0.353
25	T, S₂, D₁, D₂, I₁	17	17	0.353
26	T, S₃, D₁, D₂, I₂	19	19	0.340
27	T, S₂, S₂, D₂, D₁, I₂	20	20	0.334
28	T, S₂, S₂, D₂, D₁, I₂	20	20	0.334
29	T, S₂, S₂, D₂, D₁, I₃	22	22	0.324
30	T, S₂, S₂, D₁, D₂, I₁	16	16	0.361
31	T, S₂, S₂, D₁, D₂, I₂	18	18	0.346
32	T, S₁, D₂, D₁, D₂, I₁	14	14	0.379
33	T, S₂, D₂, D₁, D₂, I₁	16	16	0.361
34	T, S₂, D₂, D₁, D₂, I₂	18	18	0.346
35	T, S₁, D₂, D₁, D₂, I₂	16	16	0.361
36	T, S₂, S₂, D₂, D₁, D₂, I₁	17	17	0.353
37	T, S₂, S₂, D₂, D₁, D₂, I₂	19	19	0.340