Multi-objective optimization of top-level arrangement for flight test

doi:10.23919/JSEE.2025.000019

Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 714-724.doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2025.000019

• • 上一篇

收稿日期:2023-03-02 出版日期:2025-06-18 发布日期:2025-07-10

Multi-objective optimization of top-level arrangement for flight test

Yunong WANG(), Wenhao BI(), Qiucen FAN(), Shuangfei XU(), An ZHANG()

School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China

Received:2023-03-02 Online:2025-06-18 Published:2025-07-10
Contact: An ZHANG E-mail:wangyn@mail.nwpu.edu.cn;biwenhao@nwpu.edu.cn;fanqc1006@mail.nwpu.edu.cn;xsf@mail.nwpu.edu.cn;zhangan@nwpu.edu.cn
About author:
WANG Yunong was born in 1994. She received her B.S. degree in control-engineering from Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China, in 2017. She is pursuing her Ph.D. degree in system engineering. Her research interests include system engineering, model-based system engineering, process management, and operational research. E-mail: wangyn@mail.nwpu.edu.cn

BI Wenhao was born in 1986. He received his Ph.D. degree in system engineering from Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China, in 2018. He is currently an assistant researcher with Northwestern Polytechnical University. His research interests include system engineering and evidence theory. E-mail: biwenhao@nwpu.edu.cn

FAN Qiucen was born in 1996. He received his B.S and M.S. degree in aircraft design and engineering from Northwestern Polytechnical University of China, Xi’an in 2019 and 2022 respectively. He is pursuing his Ph.D. degree in aeronautical and astronautical science and technology. His current research interests include design theory and model-based systems engineering. E-mail: fanqc1006@mail.nwpu.edu.cn

XU Shuangfei was born in 1996. He received his B.S. degree in control engineering from Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China, in 2018. He is pursuing his Ph.D. degree in control theory. His research interests include decision-making, artificial intelligence, and task planning. E-mail: xsf@mail.nwpu.edu.cn

ZHANG An was born in 1962. He received his M.S. degree in system engineering and Ph.D. degree in control theory and control engineering from Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China, in 1986 and 1999, respectively. He is a professor with Northwestern Polytechnical University. His research interests include system engineering and decision theory. E-mail: zhangan@nwpu.edu.cn
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62073267;61903305) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (HXGJXM202214).

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

The lack of systematic and scientific top-level arrangement in the field of civil aircraft flight test leads to the problems of long duration and high cost. Based on the flight test activity, mathematical models of flight test duration and cost are established to set up the framework of flight test process. The top-level arrangement for flight test is optimized by multi-objective algorithm to reduce the duration and cost of flight test. In order to verify the necessity and validity of the mathematical models and the optimization algorithm of top-level arrangement, real flight test data is used to make an example calculation. Results show that the multi-objective optimization results of the top-level flight arrangement are better than the initial arrangement data, which can shorten the duration, reduce the cost, and improve the efficiency of flight test.

Key words: flight test, top-level arrangement, flight test optimization, multi-objective optimization

. [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 36(3): 714-724.

Yunong WANG, Wenhao BI, Qiucen FAN, Shuangfei XU, An ZHANG. Multi-objective optimization of top-level arrangement for flight test[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2025, 36(3): 714-724.

图/表 11

参考文献 32

1	POKORA W, KOSINSKI W The change control in aircraft testing. Journal of Kones, 2012, 19 (3): 355- 362.
2	KULKARNI A R, LA ROCCA G, VELDHUIS L L M, et al Sub-scale flight test model design: developments, challenges and opportunities. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2022, 130, 100798. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2021.100798
3	XU S F, ZHANG A, BI W H, et al Optimization of flight test tasks allocation and sequencing using genetic algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 2022, 115, 108241. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108241
4	PARK H U, CHUNG J, KWON O Application of virtual flight test framework with derivative design optimization. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2018, 90 (9): 1445- 1463. doi: 10.1108/AEAT-06-2017-0149
5	DERRECK H. Optimization models for flight test scheduling. TeXas: Southern Methodist University ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2014.
6	DUAN Z , SUN H R, WU C Y, et al. Multi-objective optimization of the aircraft environment control system based on component-level parameter decomposition. Energy, 2022, 15(245): 123330.
7	COVAULT C Boeing sets costly delta Ⅲ flight test. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 2000, 152 (25): 27- 30.
8	JMC K The Airbus 380 and Boeing 787: a role in the recovery of the airline transport market. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2007, 1 (13): 16- 22.
9	FRANCIS L China’s COMAC to challenge Boeing and Airbus. Spectrum IEEE, 2016, 53 (1): 49- 50. doi: 10.1109/MSPEC.2016.7367467
10	CZECH M, SHOEMARKET C. Propulsion airframe aeroacoustics and aircraft system noise flight test on the Boeing 2020 ecoDemonstrator program. Proc. of the 28th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics, 2022. DOI: 10.2514/6.2022-2994.
11	SHEN H L. Using genetic algorithms for optimal ordering problem of flight test maneuver. Flight Dynamics, 2001, 19(1): 20−23. (in Chinese)
12	LIU F, WANG L X, TAN X S, et al Digital virtual flight testing and evaluation method for flight characteristics airworthiness compliance of civil aircraft based on HQRM. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2015, 28 (1): 112- 120. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2014.12.013
13	YUAN C, XIU H X, TIAN H L Research on civil aircraft test flight planning and management technology. Civil Aircraft Design & Research, 2014, 3, 1- 4, 52.
14	YUAN C Analysis of influencing factors and feasibility suggestion of civil aircraft flight test cycles based on engineering experience and AHP. Civil Aircraft Design & Research, 2023, 1, 108- 114.
15	ZHANG D W, MA F. Civil aircraft flight test optimization based on FTCS software. Civil Aircraft Design & Research, 2014, 4: 91−94. (in Chinese)
16	LIU Y, XIE Q. Technical characteristics of digital twin and application prospect in flight test. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(6): 10. (in Chinese)
17	YAN Z K, GUO B Z Investigation and realization of flight test task optimization for civil aircraft. Civil Aircraft Design & Research, 2014, (3): 12- 16.
18	NI Y Discussion on the task division game of large aircraft test prototype. Science & Technology Vision, 2017, (6): 130- 131.
19	DING J L. Civil aircraft flight test and airworthiness management mode research. Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Public Service, Economic Management and Sustainable Development, 2023. DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-344-3_32.
20	WANG Y, YAO K K, WANG H Application of deep learning in digital test flight. China Science and Technology Information, 2019, 3, 30- 31,34.
21	LIU Y H. Design and implementation of management and optimizing system for civil aircraft flight test. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013. (in Chinese)
22	FENG S D. Research and implementation of digitalized management system for civil aircraft flight test task. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2014. (in Chinese)
23	GUO Z X. Planning of flight simulator data package flight test for civil aircraft. Proc. of the 8th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Automation Science, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/ICMEAS57305.2022.00056.
24	LIU Y B, XIAO G, WANG M. An improved genetic algorithm for flight test subject allocation problem. Proc. of the IEEE Digital Avionics System Conference, 2019. DOI:10.1109/DASC43569.2019.9081633.
25	LIU Y B, XIAO G, CHEN Y. A similarity comparison method of flight test points based on probabilistic algorithm. Proc. of International Conference on Aerospace System Science and Engineering, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-6061-9_13.
26	DORIGO M, MANIEZZO V, COLORNI A Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Trans. on SMC-Part B, 1996, 26 (1): 29.
27	DORIGO M, BONABEAU E, THERAULAZ G Ant algorithms and stigmergy. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2000, 16 (8): 851- 871. doi: 10.1016/S0167-739X(00)00042-X
28	EBERHART R, KENNEDY J. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. Proc. of the MHS95 6th International Symposium on Micro Machine & Human Science, 2002: 2306−2318.
29	KOLLAT J B, REED P M. The value of online adaptive search: a performance comparison of NSGAII, ε-NSGAII and εMOEA. Proc. of the Evolution Multi-Criterion Optimization, 2025, 34(10): 386−398.
30	JOURDAN D. Layout optimization for a wireless sensor network using a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Proc. of IEEE 59th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004. DOI: 10.1109/VETECS.2004.1391366.
31	SRINIVAS N, DEB K. Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evolutionary Computation, 1994, 2(3): 221−248.
32	DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182−197.

Serial number	Subject	Subject estimated test time/h
1	Takeoff performance	52
2	Takeoff climbing	30
3	Descent performance	43
4	Primary flight control systems function test	220
5	Trim	20
6	Drag polar curve	34
7	Pilot induced oscillation	21
8	Function and reliable test	85
9	Avionics malfunction test	63

Number	Parameter	Value
1	Fuel consumption rate (t flight hour)	6.0
2	Fuel price/(yuan/t)	6000
3	Quantity of engines	2
4	Maximum take-off weight/t	242
5	Average distance per flight/km	500
6	Maintenance per flight hour/(yuan flight hour)	8307
7	FTV manufacturing cost/yuan×10⁸	1
8	Number of an FTV’ test polit	2
9	Number of an FTV’ flight test engineer	5
10	Test polit annual salary/yuan×10⁴	100
11	Flight test engineer annual salary/yuan×10⁴	50
12	Aircraft ground annual salary/Ten thousand yuan	0
13	Daily airport parking cost/(yuan/plane/d)	980
14	Maximum acceptability flight test duration/d	930
15	Maximum acceptability flight test cost/yuan×10⁸	75

FTV	Second FTV delivery interval/d	Third FTV delivery interval/d	Fourth FTV delivery interval/d	Total duration/d	Total cost/yuan×10⁸
4	243	72	210	952.1250	4.5534

Solution	${N_{\text{FTV}}}$	${t_j}$	${t_j}$	${t_j}$	${t_j}$	${t_j}$	${t_j}$	$ {N_{\text{avg}\_\text{sorties}}} $	$ {t_{\text{single}\_\text{time}}} $	$ {T_{\text{total}}} $	${C_{\text{total}}}$
1	2	40.14						20	3.45	878.78	20.978
2	3	40.21	30.15					19	3.49	595.04	30.795
3	3	41.09	31.98					20	3.50	591.32	32.578
4	4	40.22	30.01	31.25				20	3.48	471.89	42.424
5	4	40.12	33.53	32.67				19	3.50	471.38	41.943
6	5	40.09	30.21	30.21	30.77			20	3.50	400.27	51.876
7	5	40.22	31.31	32.42	31.59			20	3.50	425.43	52.437
8	5	41.59	31.29	31.50	31.59			19	2.50	416.21	56.653
9	6	41.68	30.90	31.35	33.69	30.99		19	3.47	357.94	60.186
10	7	40.98	32.11	32.05	31.59	30.43	33.64	19	3.49	321.29	68.671

Multi-objective optimization of top-level arrangement for flight test

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 32

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价