1 |
DoD Architechture Framework Working Group. DoD architechture framework version V2.0. https://dodcio.defense.gov/Library/DoD-Architecture-Framework/.
|
2 |
DONG Q C, WANG Z X, CHEN G Y, et al Domain-specific modeling and verification for C4ISR capability requirements. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19 (5): 1334- 1340.
doi: 10.1007/s11771-012-1146-7
|
3 |
ZHANG T T, LIU X M, WANG Z X, et al Capability-oriented architectural analysis method based on fuzzy description logic. Computer Science and Information Systems, 2015, 13 (1): 287- 308.
|
4 |
CICCOZZI F, MALAVOLTA I, SELIC B Execution of UML models: a systematic review of research and practice. Software and Systems Modeling, 2019, 18 (3): 2313- 2360.
doi: 10.1007/s10270-018-0675-4
|
5 |
ABDOLI S, SAMI K A modelling framework to design executable logical architecture of engineering systems. Modern Applied Science, 2017, 11 (9): 75- 91.
doi: 10.5539/mas.v11n9p75
|
6 |
BERGMAYR A, BRUNELIERE H, CABOT J. fREX: fUML-based reverse engineering of executable behavior for software dynamic analysis. Proc. of the 8th Workshop on Modelling in Software Engineering—Co-located with ICSE 2016, 2016: 20–26.
|
7 |
CICCOZZI F On the automated translational execution of the action language for foundational UML. Software and Systems Modeling, 2018, 17 (4): 1311- 1337.
doi: 10.1007/s10270-016-0556-7
|
8 |
Object Management Group. Unified modeling language (UML) V2.5. 1. https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/.
|
9 |
SOLTANA G, SANNIER N, SABETZADEH M, et al Model-based simulation of legal policies: framework, tool support, and validation. Software and Systems Modeling, 2018, 17 (3): 851- 883.
doi: 10.1007/s10270-016-0542-0
|
10 |
DRAGOMIR I, OBER I, PERCEBOIS C Contract-based modeling and verification of timed safety requirements within SysML. Software and Systems Modeling, 2017, 16 (2): 587- 624.
doi: 10.1007/s10270-015-0481-1
|
11 |
Object Management Group. Semantics of a foundational subset for executable UML models. https://www.omg.org/spec/FUML.
|
12 |
Object Management Group. Action language for foundational UML (Alf) V1.1. https://www.omg.org/spec/ALF/.
|
13 |
BAI Y, ZHANG Y X, ZHOU Y Z Process algebra-based formal service description method. Journal of Tsinghua University, 2012, 52 (12): 1769- 1775.
|
14 |
VANGLABBEEK R J. Communicating sequential processes. http://theory.stanford.edu/people/rvg/abstracts.html#1.
|
15 |
LIN K P, CHAO W S The structure-behavior coalescence approach for systems modeling. IEEE Access, 2019, 7 (1): 8609- 8620.
|
16 |
ABDELHALIM I, SCHNEIDER S, TREHARNE H An integrated framework for checking the behaviour of fUML models using CSP. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 2013, 15 (4): 375- 396.
doi: 10.1007/s10009-012-0243-0
|
17 |
MICHAEL H. Essential business process modeling. Sebastopol, California: O’Reilly Media, 2009.
|
18 |
CIOCCHETTA F, HILLSTON J Bio-PEPA: an extension of the process algebra PEPA for biochemical networks. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 2008, 194 (3): 103- 117.
doi: 10.1016/j.entcs.2007.12.008
|
19 |
HOARE T, STADEN S V The laws of programming unify process calculi. Science of Computer Programming, 2014, 85 (Part B): 102- 114.
|
20 |
DIMITRIS K, LOUIS R, ANTONIO G D, et al. The Epsilon book, 2018. https://www.eclipse.org/epsilon.
|
21 |
LIU C, TANG T Epsilon-based model transformation and verification of train control system specification. Proc. of the 30th Chinese Control Conference, 2011, 5562- 5567.
|
22 |
ZHANG Z H, ZHANG X L, XU Z J, et al Emergency countermeasures against marine disasters in Qingdao City on the basis of scenario analysis. Natural Hazards, 2015, 75 (2): 233- 255.
|
23 |
LIMA L, MIYAZWA A, CAVALCANTI A, et al An integrated semantics for reasoning about SysML design models using refinement. Software and Systems Modeling, 2015, 16 (3): 875- 902.
|
24 |
LUO R B, GAO S S, LI H L, et al Modeling and verification of reconfigurable printing system based on process algebra. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 2018, 9189836.
|
25 |
DAVE S, FRANK B, MARCELO P, et al. EMF: eclipse modeling framework. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Addison-Wesley Professional, 2008.
|
26 |
Object Management Group. XML metadata interchange (XMI). https://www.omg.org/spec/XMI/2.5.1/PDF.
|
27 |
BRUNNER J, LAMMICH P Formal verification of an executable LTL model checker with partial order reduction. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 2018, 60 (1): 3- 21.
doi: 10.1007/s10817-017-9418-4
|
28 |
GLABBEEK R V, HOFNER P H, MARKL M A process algebra for link layer protocols. Programming Languages and Systems, 2019, 11423, 668- 693.
|
29 |
BALABAN M, MARA E A Removing redundant multiplicity constraints in UML class models. Software and Systems Modeling, 2019, 18 (4): 2717- 2751.
doi: 10.1007/s10270-018-0696-z
|
30 |
XIANG S Q, WU X, ZHU H B, et al Modeling and verifying basic modules of floodlight. Mobile Networks and Applications, 2019, 24 (1): 100- 114.
doi: 10.1007/s11036-018-1141-9
|