Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 105-119.doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2022.000012
-
收稿日期:2021-08-27接受日期:2022-02-11出版日期:2022-01-18发布日期:2022-02-22
Impact of the synergy between technology management and technological capability on new product development: a system dynamics approach
Qian MA1,2(
), Weiwei WU1(), Yexin LIU3,*(), Zhou LIANG1(), Lingzhi KOU1()
- 1 School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
2 Beijing Institute of Aerospace Information, Beijing 100854, China
3 School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology at Weihai, Weihai 264209, China
-
Received:2021-08-27Accepted:2022-02-11Online:2022-01-18Published:2022-02-22 -
Contact:Yexin LIU E-mail:164164851@qq.com;wuweiwei@hit.edu.cn;liuyexin1990@163.com;810164900@qq.com;360876639@qq.com -
About author:|MA Qian was born in 1983. She is a Ph.D. candidate at the School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology. She is working in Beijing Institute of Aerospace Information as a senior engineer. Her research interests are technology management, knowledge management, and systems engineering. E-mail:
164164851@qq.com ||WU Weiwei was born in 1978. He is a professor at Harbin Institute of Technology. He received his Ph.D. degree in management from Harbin Institute of Technology in 2006. His research interests are technology management and knowledge management. E-mail:
wuweiwei@hit.edu.cn ||LIU Yexinwas born in 1990. He is an assistant professor at Harbin Institute of Technology at Weihai. He received his Ph.D. degree in management from Harbin Institute of Technology in 2019. His research interest is technology management. E-mail:
liuyexin1990@163.com ||LIANG Zhou was born in 1993. She is a Ph.D. candidate at the School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology. Her research interest is technology management. E-mail:
810164900@qq.com ||KOU Lingzhi was born in 1994. She received her M.S. degree in management from Harbin Institute of Technology in 2019. Her research interest is technology management. E-mail:
360876639@qq.com -
Supported by:This work was supported by the Heilongjiang Philosophy and Social Science Research Project (19GLB087).
引用本文
. [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(1): 105-119.
Qian MA, Weiwei WU, Yexin LIU, Zhou LIANG, Lingzhi KOU. Impact of the synergy between technology management and technological capability on new product development: a system dynamics approach[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(1): 105-119.
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
| Variable name | Variable type | Initial value |
| Knowledge stock of human capability subsystem | Stock | 1 |
| Human knowledge increasing | Flow | — |
| Human knowledge decreasing | Flow | — |
| Decreasing rate of human knowledge | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
| Knowledge increasing rate of human capability subsystem | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Human resource management capability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Incentive mechanism | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Knowledge stock of information capability subsystem | Stock | 1 |
| Information knowledge increasing | Flow | — |
| Information knowledge decreasing | Flow | — |
| Decreasing rate of information knowledge | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
| Knowledge increasing rate of information capability subsystem | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Information management capability | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Technology information transmission channel | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Information technology knowledge system | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Organization communication mechanism | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| External public relations | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Knowledge stock of equipment capability subsystem | Stock | 1 |
| Equipment knowledge increasing | Flow | — |
| Equipment knowledge decreasing | Flow | — |
| Decreasing rate of equipment knowledge | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
| Knowledge increasing rate of equipment capability subsystem | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Equipment management regulations | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Number of advanced equipment introduction | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Knowledge stock of organization capability subsystem | Stock | 1 |
| Organization knowledge increasing | Flow | — |
| Organization knowledge decreasing | Flow | — |
| Decreasing rate of organization knowledge | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
| Knowledge increasing rate of organization capability subsystem | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Management coordination ability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Internal and external environment adaptability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Department cooperation ability | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Risk-control mechanism | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Knowledge stock of technology management subsystem | Stock | 1 |
| Management knowledge increasing | Flow | — |
| Management knowledge decreasing | Flow | — |
| Decreasing rate of management knowledge | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
| Knowledge increasing rate of technology management system | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Technology resource management capability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Technology organization management capability | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Technology quality management capability | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Material management capability | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Number of new product development ideas | Stock | 1 |
| Ideas increasing | Flow | — |
| Ideas decreasing | Flow | — |
| Elimination rate | Auxiliary variable | 0.85 |
| Increasing rate | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Team innovation ability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Input in innovation ideas | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Top management support | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Investment in new product development | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Leading degree of product technology | Stock | 1 |
| Leading degree increasing | Flow | — |
| Leading degree decreasing | Flow | 0.1 |
| Increasing rate of leading degree | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Investment in technology development | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Team technology level | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Decreasing rate of leading degree | Auxiliary variable | — |
| New product development cycle | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Market competition | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Profit | Stock | 1 |
| Change in sales | Flow | — |
| Change in cost | Flow | — |
| Changing rate of sales | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Changing rate of cost | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Marketing capability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Leading degree of product technology | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Synergy between technology management and human capability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Synergy between technology management and information capability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Synergy between technology management and equipment capability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Synergy between technology management and organization capability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Willness of synergy between technology management and human capability | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
| Willness of synergy between technology management and information capability | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
| Willness of synergy between technology management and equipment capability | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
| Willness of synergy between technology management and organization capability | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
"
"
"
| 1 | CHENG C, YANG M Creative process engagement and new product performance: the role of new product development speed and leadership encouragement of creativity. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 99 (7): 215- 225. |
| 2 |
VERONA G A resource-based view of product development. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24 (1): 132- 142.
doi: 10.5465/amr.1999.1580445 |
| 3 |
BAKAR L J A, AHMAD H Assessing the relationship between firm resources and product innovation performance: a resource-based view. Business Process Management Journal, 2010, 16 (3): 420- 435.
doi: 10.1108/14637151011049430 |
| 4 | ZHOU K Z, WU F Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31 (5): 547- 561. |
| 5 |
CETINDAMAR D, PHAAL R, PROBERT D Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: a framework for technology management activities. Technovation, 2009, 29 (4): 237- 246.
doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.004 |
| 6 |
WU W W, YU B, WU C How China’s equipment manufacturing firms achieve successful independent innovation: the double helix mode of technological capability and technology management. Chinese Management Studies, 2012, 6 (1): 160- 183.
doi: 10.1108/17506141211213915 |
| 7 |
LIU Y X, WU W W, GAO P B, et al Exploring the different combinations of technological capability and technology management capability in different stages of new product development. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 181012- 181021.
doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2959207 |
| 8 |
COOPER R G What’s next?: after stage-gate. Research-Technology Management, 2014, 57 (1): 20- 31.
doi: 10.5437/08956308X5606963 |
| 9 |
DREJER A The discipline of management of technology, based on considerations related to technology. Technovation, 1997, 17 (5): 253- 265.
doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(96)00107-1 |
| 10 | National Research Council. Management of technology: the hidden competitive advantage. Washington, D.C., U.S.: National Academy Press, 1987. |
| 11 |
LIAO S S Technology management methodologies and applications: a literature review from 1995 to 2003. Technovation, 2005, 25 (4): 381- 393.
doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.08.002 |
| 12 |
PHAAL R, FARRUKH C J P, PROBERT D R A framework for supporting the management of technological knowledge. International Journal of Technology Management, 2004, 27 (1): 1- 15.
doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2004.003878 |
| 13 |
KANG T, BAEK C, LEE J D The persistency and volatility of the firm R&D investment: revisited from the perspective of technological capability. Research Policy, 2017, 46 (9): 1570- 1579.
doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.07.006 |
| 14 | AYDIN H Market orientation and product innovation: the mediating role of technological capability. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2020, 24 (4): 1233- 1267. |
| 15 |
WU J Cooperation with competitors and product innovation: Moderating effects of technological capability and alliances with universities. Industrial Marketing Management, 2014, 43 (2): 199- 209.
doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.002 |
| 16 |
MA Q, WU W W, LIU Y X The fit between technology management and technological capability and its impact on new product development performance. Sustainability, 2021, 13 (19): 10956.
doi: 10.3390/su131910956 |
| 17 | LIU Y X, WU W W, WANG Y The impacts of technology management on product innovation: the role of technological capability. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 210722- 210732. |
| 18 | COOPER R G, SOMMER A F Agile-Stage-Gate for manufacturers: changing the way new products are developed integrating agile project management methods into a Stage-Gate system offers both opportunities and challenges. Research-Technology Management, 2018, 61 (2): 17- 26. |
| 19 |
ERNST H, HOYER W D, RUBSAAMEN C Sales, marketing, and research-and-development cooperation across new product development stages: implications for success. Journal of Marketing, 2010, 74 (5): 80- 92.
doi: 10.1509/jmkg.74.5.080 |
| 20 | GENC E, DI BENEDETTO C A Cross-functional integration in the sustainable new product development process: the role of the environmental specialist. Industrial Marketing Management, 2015, 50 (10): 150- 161. |
| 21 |
TROY L C, HIRUNYAWIPADA T, PASWAN A K Cross-functional integration and new product success: an empirical investigation of the findings. Journal of Marketing, 2008, 72 (6): 132- 146.
doi: 10.1509/jmkg.72.6.132 |
| 22 |
SONG X M, PARRY M E The R&D-marketing interface in Japanese high-technology firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1992, 9 (2): 91- 112.
doi: 10.1111/1540-5885.920091 |
| 23 |
POLES R System dynamics modelling of a production and inventory system for remanufacturing to evaluate system improvement strategies. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 144 (1): 189- 199.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.003 |
| 24 | RUUTU S, CASEY T, KOTOVIRTA V Development and competition of digital service platforms: a system dynamics approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 117 (4): 119- 130. |
| 25 |
WU D D, KEFAN X, HUA L, et al Modeling technological innovation risks of an entrepreneurial team using system dynamics: an agent-based perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2010, 77 (6): 857- 869.
doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.01.015 |
| 26 | HSIEH Y H, CHOU Y H Modeling the impact of service innovation for small and medium enterprises: a system dynamics approach. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2018, 82 (3): 84- 102. |
| 27 |
YEON S J, PARK S H, KIM S W A dynamic diffusion model for managing customer’s expectation and satisfaction. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2006, 73 (6): 648- 665.
doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.05.001 |
| 28 | SCHWEITZER F, ZHANG Y, CASIRAGHI G Intervention scenarios to enhance knowledge transfer in a network of firms. Frontiers in Physics, 2020, 8 (9): 382. |
| No related articles found! |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||