Resilience based importance measure analysis for SoS

doi:10.21629/JSEE.2019.05.10

Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 920-930.doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2019.05.10

收稿日期:2019-03-06 出版日期:2019-10-08 发布日期:2019-10-09

Resilience based importance measure analysis for SoS

Xing PAN^1,*(), Huixiong WANG¹(), Yanjing YANG^1,²(), Guozhong ZHANG³()

¹ School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
² China Railway Signal and Communication Corporation, Beijing 100070, China
³ Institute of Systems Engineering, China State Shipbuilding Corporation, Beijing 100036, China

Received:2019-03-06 Online:2019-10-08 Published:2019-10-09
Contact: Xing PAN E-mail:panxing@buaa.edu.cn;wanghuixiong@buaa.edu.cn;yangyanjing@crscu.com.cn;18911990023@189.cn
About author:PAN Xing was born in 1979. He received his B.S. degree in mechanical engineering, and Ph.D. degree in systems engineering from Beihang University (BUAA), Beijing, China, in 2000, and 2005, respectively. From 2005 to 2009, he was an assistant professor with the School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China. Since 2009, he has been an associate professor. From 2012 to 2013, he was a visiting scholar at the Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA. His research interests include reliability engineering, systems engineering, and system risk analysis. E-mail: panxing@buaa.edu.cn|WANG Huixiong was born in 1995. He received his B.S. degree in safety science from School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, in 2018. He is currently a master student in the same school. His interests of research include systems engineering and complex network. E-mail: wanghuixiong@buaa.edu.cn|YANG Yanjing was born in 1991. He received his B.S. degree in material engineering from Yanshan University in 2015, and M.S. degree in industrial engineering from Beihang University in 2018. Since 2018, he has been an assistant engineer at China Railway Signal and Communication Corporation. His research interests include signal system engineering and system and systems engineering (SoSE). E-mail: yangyanjing@crscu.com.cn|ZHANG Guozhong was born in 1979. He is a senior engineer with the Institute of Systems Engineering, China State Shipbuilding Corporation. His research interest is system of systems engineering (SoSE). E-mail: 18911990023@189.cn
Supported by:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(71571004);This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71571004)

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

In a system of systems (SoS), resilience is an important factor in maintaining the functionality, stability, and enhancing the operation effectiveness. From the perspective of resilience, this paper studies the importance of the SoS, and a resilience-based importance measure analysis is conducted to provide suggestions in the design and optimization of the structure of the SoS. In this paper, the components of the SoS are simplified as four kinds of network nodes: sensor, decision point, influencer, and target. In this networked SoS, the number of operation loops is used as the performance indicator, and an approximate algorithm, which is based on eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix, is proposed to calculate the number of operation loops. In order to understand the performance change of the SoS during the attack and defense process in the operations, an integral resilience model is proposed to depict the resilience of the SoS. From different perspectives of enhancing the resilience, different measures, parameters and the corresponding algorithms for the resilience importance of components are proposed. Finally, a case study on an SoS is conducted to verify the validity of the network modelling and the resilience-based importance analysis method.

Key words: system of systems (SoS), resilience, network mo-delling, importance measure analysis, operation loop

. [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 30(5): 920-930.

Xing PAN, Huixiong WANG, Yanjing YANG, Guozhong ZHANG. Resilience based importance measure analysis for SoS[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 30(5): 920-930.

图/表 17

参考文献 42

1	GAMA DESSAVRE D, RAMIREZ-MARQUEZ J E, BARKER K. Multidimensional approach to complex system resilience analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2016, 149, 34- 43. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.009
2	OUYANG M, DUEÑAS-OSORIO L, MIN X. A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems. Structural Safety, 2012, 36/37, 23- 31. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004
3	HENRY D, RAMIREZ-MARQUEZ J E. Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2012, 99, 114- 122. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2011.09.002
4	HOLLING C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4 (1): 1- 23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
5	WEBB C T. What is the role of ecology in understanding ecosystem resilience?. BioScience, 2007, 57 (6): 470- 471. doi: 10.1641/B570602
6	KECK M, SAKDAPOLRAK P. What is social resilience?Lessons learned and ways forward. Erdkunde, 2013, 67 (1): 5- 19. doi: 10.3112/erdkunde.2013.01.02
7	COHEN O, LEYKIN D, LAHAD M, et al. The conjoint community resiliency assessment measure as a baseline for profiling and predicting community resilience for emergencies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2013, 80 (9): 1732- 1741. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.009
8	ROSE A, LIAO S Y. Modeling regional economic resilience to disasters:a computable general equilibrium analysis of water service disruptions. Journal of Regional Science, 2005, 45 (1): 75- 112. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00365.x
9	MARTIN R. Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. Journal of Economic Geography, 2012, 12 (1): 1- 32. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
10	YOUN B D, HU C, WANG P. Resilience-driven system design of complex engineered systems. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2011, 133 (10): 101011. doi: 10.1115/1.4004981
11	HOLLNAGEL E, WOODS D D, LEVESON N. Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2007.
12	LAC C, STERBENZ J P G, PLATTNER B, et al. Network resilience:a systematic approach. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2011, 49 (7): 88- 97. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2011.5936160
13	CARES J R. Distributed networked operations: the foundations of network centric warfare. Bloomington: Iuniverse Inc, 2006.
14	KRISHNAMURTHY V. Emission management for low probability intercept sensors in network centric warfare. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2005, 41 (1): 133- 151. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2005.1413752
15	REN W, LI Y, LU J, et al. Operational demand optimization of defend special target under national air defense. Armament Automation, 2007, 26 (9): 12- 13.
16	LI Y J, SONG Y L, CHEN X R, et al. The analysis for CEPR plant state restoration method after degrade mode test. Science and Technology Vision, 2018, 1 (17): 1- 3.
17	ZHONG J L, GUO J L, WANG Z J, et al. Research on phased mission based efficient reliability evaluation algorithm for equipment system of systems. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38 (1): 232- 238.
18	XU S L, ZHANG D, ZHAO H Y. Research on the multimissile cooperative technology based on systemic confrontation. Tactical Missile Technology, 2019, 1 (1): 79- 86.
19	WU Y, GE Y T, ZHANG D Q. Development of precision strike weapons and key technologies by reviewing DARPA research programs. Tactical Missile Technology, 2017, 1 (6): 1- 8.
20	BARKER K, RAMIREZ-MARQUEZ J E, ROCCO C M. Resilience-based network component importance measures. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2013, 117, 89- 97. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.03.012
21	MANUAL J. The long road to recovery:environmental health impacts of hurricane sandy. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2013, 121 (5): A152- 9.
22	LIPTON E. Cost of storm-debris removal in city is at least twice the US average. New York: The New York Times, 2013.
23	UDAY P, MARAIS K. Exploiting stand-in redundancy to improve resilience in a system-of-systems (SoS). Procedia Computer Science, 2013, 16, 532- 541. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.056
24	PAN X, JIANG Z, YANG Y J. Resilience-based component importance and recovery strategy for system-of-systems. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017, 43 (9): 1713- 1720.
25	DUTUIT Y, RAUZY A. Efficient algorithms to assess component and gate importance in fault tree analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2001, 72, 213- 222. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00004-7
26	LI J H, MOSLEH A, KANG R. Likelihood ratio gradient estimation for dynamic reliability applications. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2011, 96, 1667- 1679. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2011.08.001
27	BORGONOVO E. A new uncertainty importance measure. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2007, 92, 771- 784. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.015
28	BORGONOVO E, PLISCHKE E. Sensitivity analysis:a review of recent advances. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 248 (3): 869- 887. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.032
29	LIU Q, HOMMA T. A new computational method of a moment-independent uncertainty importance measure. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009, 94, 1205- 1211. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.10.005
30	PAN X, HU L H, XIN Z L, et al. Risk scenario generation based on importance measure analysis. Sustainability, 2018, 10 (9): 3207. doi: 10.3390/su10093207
31	ZHANG L, LU Z, CHENG L, et al. A new method for evaluating Borgonovo moment-independent importance measure with its application in an aircraft structure. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2014, 132, 163- 175. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.011
32	BORGONOVO E, ALIEE H, GLAß M, et al. A new timeindependent reliability importance measure. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 254 (2): 427- 442.
33	DUI H, SI S, YAM R C. A cost-based integrated importance measure of system components for preventive maintenance. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2017, 168, 98- 104. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.025
34	SHI Y, LU Z, ZHOU Y. Global sensitivity analysis for fuzzy inputs based on the decomposition of fuzzy output entropy. Engineering Optimization, 2018, 50 (6): 1078- 1096. doi: 10.1080/0305215X.2017.1359585
35	WU Y, PAN X, KANG R, et al. Multi-parameters uncertainty analysis of logistic support process based on GERT. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 25 (16): 1011- 1019.
36	FANG Y P, PEDRONI N, ZIO E. Resilience-based component importance measures for critical infrastructure network systems. IEEE Trans. on Reliability, 2016, 65 (2): 502- 512. doi: 10.1109/TR.2016.2521761
37	DESSAVRE D G, RAMIREZ-MARQUEZ J E, BARKER K. Multidimensional approach to complex system resilience analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2016, 149, 34- 43. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.009
38	PAN X, WANG H. Resilience of and recovery strategies for weighted networks. PLoS ONE, 2018, 13 (9): 1- 15.
39	VON LUBITZ D, BEAKLEY J E, PATRICELLI F. All hazards approach to disaster management:the role of information and information and knowledge management, Boyd's OODA loop, and network-centricity. Disasters, 2008, 32 (4): 561- 585. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01055.x
40	BRYANT D J. Rethinking OODA:toward a modern cognitive framework of command decision making. Military Psychology, 2006, 18 (3): 183- 206. doi: 10.1207/s15327876mp1803_1
41	ESTRADA E, RODRÍGUEZ-VELÁZQUEZ J A. Subgraph centrality in complex networks. Physical Review E, 2005, 71 (5): 56103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.056103
42	TAN Y J, ZHANG X K, YANG K W. Research on networked description and modeling methods of armament system-ofsystems. Journal of Systems and Management, 2016, 21 (6): 781- 786.

Type	Notation	Number
Sensor (S)	$S_{1}$, $S_{2}$, $S_{3}$, $S_{4}$, $S_{5}$, $ S_{6}$, $S_{7}$, $S_{8}$	8
Decision point (D)	$D_{1}$, $D_{2}$, $D_{3}$	3
Influencer (I)	$I_{1}$, $ I_{2}$, $I_{3}$, $I_{4}$, $I_{5}$, $I_{6}$, $ I_{7}$, $I_{8}$	8
Target (T)	$T_{1}$, $T_{2}$, $T_{3}$, $T_{4}$	4

Connection	Notation	Probability
Target$ \to $Sensor	$P_{TS}$	0.4
Sensor$ \to $Decision point	$P_{SD}$	0.6
Decision point$ \to $Decision point	$P_{DD}$	0.6
Decision point$ \to $Influencer	$P_{DI}$	0.6
Influencer$ \to $Target	$P_{IT}$	0.3

Node	$S_{1}$	$D_{1}$	$I_{1}$	$S_{8}$	$S_{4}$	$I_{5}$
Degree	5	15	2	6	3	2
MTTR	1.6	2	1.4	1.6	1.6	1.4

Measure	Normal	Adding node $S$	Adding node $D$	Adding node $I$
$R$	0.641 6	0.741 5	0.851 1	0.701 5
RIM		0.155 6	0.3264	0.093 2

Measure	Normal	$S_{1}$ functioning normally	$D_{1}$ functioning normally	$I_{1}$ functioning normally
$R$	0.781 0	0.840 0	0.886 2	0.832 7
RIM		0.075 5	0.134 7	0.066 2

Resilience based importance measure analysis for SoS

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 17

参考文献 42

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

Measure	No recovery	Recovering $S_{1 }$ only	Recovering $D_{1}$ only	Recovering $I_{1 }$ only
$R$	0.605 2	0.637 2	0.698 6	0.653 9
RIM		0.052 9	0.154 2	0.080 4