Mission reliability modeling and evaluation for reconfigurable unmanned weapon system-of-systems based on effective operation loop

doi:10.23919/JSEE.2023.000082

Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 588-597.doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2023.000082

• • 上一篇

收稿日期:2022-08-31 出版日期:2023-06-15 发布日期:2023-06-30

Mission reliability modeling and evaluation for reconfigurable unmanned weapon system-of-systems based on effective operation loop

Zhiwei CHEN¹(), Ziming ZHOU²^,*(), Luogeng ZHANG¹(), Chaowei CUI¹(), Jilong ZHONG³()

¹ Unmanned System Research Institute, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710109, China
² College of Science, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
³ National Institute of Defense Technology Innovation, Academy of Military Science, Beijing 100091, China

Received:2022-08-31 Online:2023-06-15 Published:2023-06-30
Contact: Ziming ZHOU E-mail:czw@nwpu.edu.cn;zhouziming@mail.nwpu.edu.cn;zlg1263299410@163.com;ccw@mail.nwpu.edu.cn;z_jilong@sina.cn
About author:
CHEN Zhiwei was born in 1991. He received his Ph.D. degree from the School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China, in 2020. He is currently an associate professor of Unmanned System Research Institute, Northwestern Polytechnical University. His research interests are reliability and safety analysis, and system-of-systems resilience. E-mail: czw@nwpu.edu.cn

ZHOU Ziming was born in 1999. He received his bachelor ’s degree in information and computing science from Northwestern Polytechnical University. He is currently studying mathematics at the University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, pursuing his master ’s degree. His research interest is unmanned aerial vehicle trajectory planning. E-mail: zhouziming@mail.nwpu.edu.cn

ZHANG Luogeng was born in 2000. He received his bachelor’s degree in mechanical design manufacture and automation from Chang ’an University. He is currently pursuing his master ’s degree at Unmanned System Research Institute, Northwestern Polytechnical University. His research interest is multi-agent resilience. E-mail: zlg1263299410@163.com

CUI Chaowei was born in 2000. He graduated from the School of Automotive Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology with a bachelor’s degree in 2022, and is currently pursuing his postgraduate degree with Unmanned System Research Institute, Northwestern Polytechnical University. His research interests are unmanned aerial vehicle motion planning and tracking control. E-mail: ccw@mail.nwpu.edu.cn

ZHONG Jilong was born in 1990. He received his bachelor ’s and master ’s and Ph.D. degrees from Air Force Engineering University. He is an engineer at National Institute of Defense Techno-logy Innovation. His research interests are complex network and system reliability. E-mail: z_jilong@sina.cn
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72101270; 72001213)

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

The concept of unmanned weapon system-of-systems (UWSoS) involves a collection of various unmanned systems to achieve or accomplish a specific goal or mission. The mission reliability of UWSoS is represented by its ability to finish a required mission above the baselines of a given mission. However, issues with heterogeneity, cooperation between systems, and the emergence of UWSoS cannot be effectively solved by traditional system reliability methods. This study proposes an effective operation-loop-based mission reliability evaluation method for UWSoS by analyzing dynamic reconfiguration. First, we present a new connotation of an effective operation loop by considering the allocation of operational entities and physical resource constraints. Then, we propose an effective operation-loop-based mission reliability model for a heterogeneous UWSoS according to the mission baseline. Moreover, a mission reliability evaluation algorithm is proposed under random external shocks and topology reconfiguration, revealing the evolution law of the effective operation loop and mission reliability. Finally, a typical 60-unmanned-aerial-vehicle-swarm is taken as an example to demonstrate the proposed models and methods. The mission reliability is achieved by considering external shocks, which can serve as a reference for evaluating and improving the effectiveness of UWSoS.

Key words: mission reliability, unmanned weapon, system-of-systems, dynamic reconfiguration, effective operation loop

. [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 34(3): 588-597.

Zhiwei CHEN, Ziming ZHOU, Luogeng ZHANG, Chaowei CUI, Jilong ZHONG. Mission reliability modeling and evaluation for reconfigurable unmanned weapon system-of-systems based on effective operation loop[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 34(3): 588-597.

图/表 8

参考文献 35

1	WARREN R J, JORDAN N, HAUSER J P. An analysis of how the U.S. government can effectively tackle supply chain barriers to scale up the low cost unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarming technology (LOCUST) program. Monterey: Naval Postgraduate School, 2019.
2	CHUNG T H. OFFensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics (OFFSET). Virginia: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, 2021.
3	FENG Q, LIU M, DUI H Y, et al Importance measure-based phased mission reliability and UAV number optimization for swarm. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2022, 223, 108478.
4	CHEN Z W, JIAO J, DE X L, et al Tradeoff optimization technology of effectiveness-cost for satellite-based on CAIV method. Journal of Sensors, 2022, 2022, 1- 12.
5	LI Z Q, DOU Y, XIA B, et al System portfolio selection based on GRA method under hesitant fuzzy environment. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33 (1): 120- 133. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2022.000013
6	JIA N P, YANG Z W, YANG K W Operational effectiveness evaluation of the swarming UAVs combat system based on a system dynamics model. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 25209- 25224. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2898728
7	SHAO J, LI M G, YANG K W. Multi-layer modeling for capability generation of UAV swarm system. Proc. of the IEEE 15th International Conference of System of Systems Engineering, 2020: 181−186.
8	SUN Q, LI H X, WANG Y Z, et al Multi-swarm-based cooperative reconfiguration model for resilient unmanned weapon system-of-systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2022, 222, 108426.
9	CARES J R, ALIDADE I. An information age combat model. Proc. of the 9th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, 2004: 1−27.
10	SALAMH F E, KARABIYIK U, ROGERS M K, et al. Unmanned aerial vehicle kill chain: purple teaming tactics. Proc. of the IEEE 11th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference, 2021: 1081−1087.
11	CHEN Z X, HE Y H, ZHAO Y X, et al Mission reliability evaluation based on operational quality data for multistate manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 2019, 57 (6): 1840- 1856. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1508906
12	BILLINTON R, WENYUAN L Hybrid approach for reliability evaluation of composite generation and transmission systems using Monte-Carlo simulation and enumeration technique. IEE Proceedings C (Generation, Transmission and Distribution), 1991, 138 (3): 233- 241. doi: 10.1049/ip-c.1991.0029
13	ZHAO Q, LI S F, DOU Y J, et al An approach for weapon system-of-systems scheme generation based on a supernetwork granular analysis. IEEE Systems Journal, 2017, 11 (4): 1971- 1982. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2015.2456105
14	CHEN Z W, ZHAO T D, JIAO J, et al. System of systems architecture modeling and mission reliability analysis based on DoDAF and Petri net. Proc. of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2019: 1−6.
15	ANDREWS J D, POOLE J, CHEN W H Fast mission reliability prediction for unmanned aerial vehicles. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2013, 120, 3- 9.
16	YANG X Z, HE Y H, ZHOU D, et al Mission reliability-centered maintenance approach based on quality stochastic flow network for multistate manufacturing systems. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc-Maintenance and Reliability, 2022, 24 (3): 455- 467. doi: 10.17531/ein.2022.3.7
17	CHENG C, YANG J, LI L Reliability assessment of multi-state phased mission systems with common bus performance sharing subjected to epistemic uncertainty. IEEE Trans. on Reliability, 2022, 71 (3): 1281- 1293. doi: 10.1109/TR.2021.3077486
18	HE Y H, CHEN Z, ZHAO Y, et al Mission reliability evaluation for fuzzy multistate manufacturing system based on an extended stochastic flow network. IEEE Trans. on Reliability, 2020, 69 (4): 1239- 1253. doi: 10.1109/TR.2019.2957502
19	LIANG Q W, SUN T Y, WANG D D Reliability indexes for multi-AUV cooperative systems. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 28 (1): 179- 186. doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2017.01.20
20	HUANG Y, PAN X, HU L H. Rapid assessment of system-of-systems (SoS) mission reliability based on Markov chains. Proc. of the First International Conference on Reliability Systems Engineering, 2015: 1−6.
21	REMENYTE-PRESCOTT R, ANDREWS J D, CHUNG P W H An efficient phased mission reliability analysis for autonomous vehicles. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2010, 95 (3): 226- 235.
22	ORDOUKHANIAN E, MADNI A M Model-based approach to engineering resilience in multi-UAV systems. Systems, 2019, 7 (1): 11. doi: 10.3390/systems7010011
23	LI J C, TAN Y J, YANG K W, et al Structural robustness of combat networks of weapon system-of-systems based on the operation loop. International Journal of Systems Science, 2017, 48 (3): 659- 674. doi: 10.1080/00207721.2016.1212429
24	LI J C, ZHAO D L, JIANG J, et al Capability oriented equipment contribution analysis in temporal combat networks. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2021, 51 (2): 696- 704. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2018.2882782
25	HAHN A, THOMAS R K, LOZANO I, et al A multi-layered and kill-chain based security analysis framework for cyber-physical systems. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 2015, 11, 39- 50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2015.08.003
26	ALHELOU H H, ABDELAZIZ A Y, SIANO P. Wide area power systems stability, protection, and security. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021.
27	JIA N P, YOU Y J, LU Y J, et al Research on the search and rescue system-of-systems capability evaluation index system construction method based on weighted supernetwork. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 97401- 97425. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2929235
28	XU B, BAI G H, ZHAN Y A et al. Failure analysis of unmanned autonomous swarm considering cascading effects. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33 (3): 759- 770.
29	LIU K K, ZHONG J L, BAI G H, et al A complex networks approach for reliability evaluation of swarm systems under malicious attacks. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 81209- 81219. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2991211
30	LI J C, JIANG J, YANG K W, et al Research on functional robustness of heterogeneous combat networks. IEEE Systems Journal, 2019, 13 (2): 1487- 1495. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2018.2828779
31	LI J C, ZHAO D L, GE B F, et al Disintegration of operational capability of heterogeneous combat networks under incomplete information. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2020, 50 (12): 5172- 5179. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2018.2867532
32	FAN D M, SUN B, DUI H Y, et al A modified connectivity link addition strategy to improve the resilience of multiplex networks against attacks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2022, 221, 108294.
33	LI J, WANG Y, ZHONG J L, et al Network resilience assessment and reinforcement strategy against cascading failure. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 2022, 160, 112271. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112271
34	TRAN H T, BALCHANOS M, DOMERCANT J C, et al A framework for the quantitative assessment of performance-based system resilience. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2017, 158, 73- 84.
35	SHANG H L, ZHANG X K, YE Z Q, et al Operation loop-based network design model for defense resource allocation with uncertainty. IEEE Systems Journal, 2019, 13 (1): 477- 488. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2018.2827206

Network mode	Implication
$ {T}_{i}\to {S}_{i} $	How sensor equipment detects enemy targets and obtains intelligence information
$ {S}_{i}\to {S}_{i} $	How one piece of sensor equipment exchanges intelligence information with another
$ {S}_{i}\to {D}_{i} $	How sensor equipment uploads the detected intelligence information to the decider equipment
$ {D}_{i}\to {D}_{i} $	How one piece of decider equipment exchanges intelligence information with another
$ {D}_{i}\to {S}_{i} $	How the decider equipment transmits orders to the sensor equipment
$ {D}_{i}\to {I}_{i} $	How the decider equipment transmits orders to the influencer equipment
$ {I}_{i}\to {T}_{i} $	How influencer equipment attacks or harasses target equipment

Parameter	Value	Parameter	Value
$ N $	1000	$ T $	100
$ {M}_{s} $	0.6	${P}_{{\rm{SS}}}$	0.6
${P}_{{\rm{SD}}}$	0.8	${P}_{{\rm{DI}}}$	0.9
${P}_{{\rm{IT}}}$	0.7	${P}_{{\rm{TS}}}$	0.7
$ {\lambda }_{S} $	0.0005	$ {\mu }_{S} $	0.002
$ {\lambda }_{D} $	0.00025	$ {\mu }_{D} $	0.007
$ {\lambda }_{I} $	0.0003	$ {\mu }_{I} $	0.0025

Mission reliability modeling and evaluation for reconfigurable unmanned weapon system-of-systems based on effective operation loop

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 35

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价