Analysis on decision-making model of plan evaluation based on grey relation projection and combination weight algorithm

doi:10.21629/JSEE.2018.04.13

Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 789-796.doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2018.04.13

收稿日期:2017-05-10 出版日期:2018-08-01 发布日期:2018-08-30

Analysis on decision-making model of plan evaluation based on grey relation projection and combination weight algorithm

Zhicai ZHANG^1,*(), Li CHEN²()

¹ Army Logistical University of PLA, Chongqing 401311, China
² Logistics University of PAP, Tianjin 300309, China

Received:2017-05-10 Online:2018-08-01 Published:2018-08-30
Contact: Zhicai ZHANG E-mail:zhangzhicai1987@163.com;314044968@qq.com
About author:ZHANG Zhicai was born in 1987. He received his B.S. degree in management engineering in 2011, and M.S. degree in applied chemistry in 2014 from Logistical Engineering University, respectively. He is currently a Ph.D. student in Army Logistical University. His research interests are petroleum of liquid (POL) service, modeling and simulation. E-mail: zhangzhicai1987@163.com|CHEN Li was born in 1989. He received his B.S. degree in oil and gas storage and transportation engineering from Wuhan University of Technology in 2011, and M.S. degree in applied chemistry from Logistical Engineering University in 2014. He is currently a teacher in Logistics University of PAP. His research interest is military fuel service. E-mail: 314044968@qq.com
Supported by:
the Education Science Fund of the Military Science Institute of Beijing, China(2015JY320);This work was supported by the Education Science Fund of the Military Science Institute of Beijing, China (2015JY320)

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

In military service joint operations, when there are more operational forces, more multifarious materials are consumed, the support is more complex and fuzzy, the deployment of personnel is more rapid, and the support provided by wartime military material support powers can be more effective. When the principles, requirements, influencing factors and goals of military material support forces are deployed in wartime, an evaluation indicator system is established. Thus, a new combined empowerment method based on an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is developed to calculate the subjective weights, and the rough entropy method is used to calculate the objective weights. Combination weights can be obtained by calculating the weight preference coefficient error, which is determined by combining the cooperative game method and the minimum deviation into objectives. This approach can determine the grey relation projection coefficient and synthesize the measure scheme superiority to finally optimize the deployment plan using the grey relation projection decision-making method. The results show that the method is feasible and effective; it can provide a more scientific and practical decision-making basis for the military material support power deployment in wartime.

Key words: method for grey relation projection decision-making, military supply power in war, deployment plan, optimization, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), rough entropy method

. [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 29(4): 789-796.

Zhicai ZHANG, Li CHEN. Analysis on decision-making model of plan evaluation based on grey relation projection and combination weight algorithm[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 29(4): 789-796.

图/表 5

参考文献 29

1	TAVANA M, HATAMI-MARBINI A. A group AHP-TOPSIS framework for human spaceflight mission planning at NASA. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38 (11): 13588- 13603. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.108
2	LIANG D C, XU Z S, LIU D, et al. Method for three-way decisions using ideal TOPSIS solutions at Pythagorean fuzzy information. Information Sciences, 2018, 435, 282- 295. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.01.015
3	LIU Y Z, FU X F, LIU Q Y. Information retrieval models based on information entropy rough sets and its applications. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, 2010, 24 (3): 149- 153.
4	ZHANG M, LIU W Y. Research on evaluation of equipment procurement organizational structure based on entropy theory. Fire Control & Command Control, 2009, 34 (5): 1- 55. doi: 10.1109/ICEMI.2007.4350509
5	HUANG K Z, HE X J, WEI H Q. Heterogeneous wireless network selection algorithm based on combinational weight. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31 (10): 2501- 2505.
6	SUN X D, JIAO Y, HU J S. Research on decision-making method based on gray correlation degree and TOPSIS. International Journal of Emerging Electric Power Systems, 2005, 4 (4): 63- 68.
7	GENG X L, QIU H Q, GONG X M. An extended 2-tuple linguistic DEA for solving MAGDM problems considering the influence relationships among attributes. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2017, 112 (10): 135- 146. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.07.040
8	LIU H C, YOU J X, YOU X Y, et al. A novel approach for failure mode and effects analysis using combination weighting and fuzzy VIKOR method. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2015, 28 (C): 579- 588. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.11.036
9	WEN W U, MENG X R, MA Z Q, et al. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of network survivability based on combinational weight. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35 (4): 786- 790.
10	DENG J L. Basic methods of grey system. Wuhan, China: Technology Press of Huazhong University, 1996.
11	DENG J L. Control problems of grey system. System and Control Letters, 1982, 1 (5): 288- 294. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80025-X
12	JAHAN A, EDWARDS L K, BAHRAMINASAB M. Multicriteria decision analysis for supporting the selection of engineering materials in product design. Oxford, United Kingdom: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2016.
13	ERGINEL N, GECER A. Fuzzy multi-objective decision model for calibration supplier selection problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2016, 102, 166- 174.
14	SUN G, GUAN X, YI X, et al. Grey relational analysis between hesitant fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition. Expert Systems with Applications, 2017, 92, 521- 532.
15	CHOU J R. Kansei clustering using fuzzy and grey relation algorithms. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 2015, 18 (6): 719- 735. doi: 10.1080/09720502.2015.1108077
16	GONG J H, LEI L P, WU M X, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on power grid enterprise operational risk based on TOPSIS method and grey relational degree. Guangdong Electric Power, 2014, 27 (2): 7- 10, 99.
17	WEI G W. Grey relational analysis model for dynamic hybrid multiple attribute decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2011, 24 (5): 672- 679. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2011.02.007
18	WALCZAK D, RUTKOWSKA A. Project rankings for participatory budget based on the fuzzy TOPSIS method. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 260 (2): 706- 714.
19	JIANG S Q, LIU S F, LIU Z X, et al. Grey incidence decisionmaking method of close degree based on the principle of "function driver" and "difference driver". Control & Decision, 2016, 31 (1): 84- 90.
20	CHANG K H, CHANG Y C, TSAI I T. Enhancing FMEA assessment by integrating grey relational analysis and the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory approach. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2013, 31 (6): 211- 224. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.02.020
21	WANG X J, ZHANG Y. Non-uniform grey relational method based on AHP and DEA. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2011, 31 (7): 1222- 1229.
22	YU J, ZHANG X, XIONG C. A methodology for evaluating micro-surfacing treatment on asphalt pavement based on grey system models and grey rational degree theory. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 150, 214- 226. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.181
23	FANG R M, SHANG R Y, WU M L, et al. Application of gray relational analysis to k-means clustering for dynamic equivalent modeling of wind farm. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42 (31): 20154- 20163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.023
24	JAFARIAN M, JAFARIAN M, MIRHEDAYATIAN S M, et al. A new fuzzy DEA model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context. Computers & Operations Research, 2015, 54 (C): 274- 285. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2014.03.002
25	DAI X L, TANG M D, LIU S X. Web service se lection based on grey correlation analysis. Computer Engineering & Science, 2016, 38 (2): 297- 304.
26	YU J, ZHANG X, XIONG C. A methodology for evaluating micro-surfacing treatment on asphalt pavement based on grey system models and grey rational degree theory. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 150, 214- 226. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.181
27	MA X, LIU Z B. Application of a novel time-delayed polynomial grey model to predict the natural gas consumption in China. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2017, 324, 17- 24. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2017.04.020
28	MA X, HU Y S, LIU Z B. A novel kernel regularized nonhomogeneous grey model and its applications. Communications in Nonlinear Science & Numerical Simulation, 2016, 48, 51- 62. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.12.017
29	WU Y H, SHEN H. Grey-related least squares support vector machine optimization model and its application in predicting natural gas consumption demand. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2018, 338, 212- 220. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2018.01.033

Plan	$C_{1}$	$C_{2}$	$C_{3}$	$C_{4}$	$C_{5}$
$P_{1}$	0.96	0.85	0.80	0.68	0.84
$P_{2}$	0.80	0.60	0.70	0.70	0.55
$P_{3}$	0.90	0.80	0.75	0.75	0.73
$P_{4}$	0.85	0.75	0.65	0.80	0.68

Evaluation indicator	$C_{1}$	$C_{2}$	$C_{3}$	$C_{4}$	$C_{5}$
$Fd_i^+ $	0.5	0.397	0.221	0.247	0.308
$Fd_i^- $	0.5	0.284	0.425	0.296	0.313

Analysis on decision-making model of plan evaluation based on grey relation projection and combination weight algorithm

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 29

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价