Quasi-LFM radar waveform recognition based on fractional Fourier transform and time-frequency analysis

doi:10.23919/JSEE.2021.000097

Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 1130-1142.doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2021.000097

收稿日期:2020-12-16 出版日期:2021-10-18 发布日期:2021-11-04

Quasi-LFM radar waveform recognition based on fractional Fourier transform and time-frequency analysis

Cunxiang XIE¹(), Limin ZHANG¹(), Zhaogen ZHONG^2,*()

¹ Department of Information Fusion, Naval Aviation University, Yantai 264001, China
² School of Aviation Basis, Naval Aviation University, Yantai 264001, China

Received:2020-12-16 Online:2021-10-18 Published:2021-11-04
Contact: Zhaogen ZHONG E-mail:932304145@qq.com;iamzlm@163.com;zhongzhaogen@163.com
About author:|XIE Cunxiang was born in 1996. He received his B.S. degree in communication engineering from the Naval Aviation University, in 2019. He is currently pursuing his M.S. degree in information and communication engineering with the Department of Information Fusion, Naval Aviation University. His research interests include deep learning and specific emitter identification. E-mail: 932304145@qq.com||ZHANG Limin was born in 1966. He received his Ph.D. degree in signal processing technology from Tianjin University, in 2005. Since 2005, he has been a professor with the Naval Aviation University. His research interests include satellite communication signal processing. E-mail: iamzlm@163.com||ZHONG Zhaogen was born in 1984. He received his Ph.D. degree in information and communication engineering from the Naval Aviation University, in 2013. He is currently an associate professor with the Naval Aviation University. His research interests include spread spectrum signal processing. E-mail: zhongzhaogen@163.com
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91538201), the Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province (ts201511020), and the project supported by Chinese National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Information System Security (6142111190404).

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

Recent advances in electronics have increased the complexity of radar signal modulation. The quasi-linear frequency modulation (quasi-LFM) radar waveforms (LFM, Frank code, P1?P4 code) have similar time-frequency distributions, and it is difficult to identify such signals using traditional time-frequency analysis methods. To solve this problem, this paper proposes an algorithm for automatic recognition of quasi-LFM radar waveforms based on fractional Fourier transform and time-frequency analysis. First of all, fractional Fourier transform and the Wigner-Ville distribution (WVD) are used to determine the number of main ridgelines and the tilt angle of the target component in WVD. Next, the standard deviation of the target component's width in the signal's WVD is calculated. Finally, an assembled classifier using neural network is built to recognize different waveforms by automatically combining the three features. Simulation results show that the overall recognition rate of the proposed algorithm reaches 94.17% under 0 dB. When the training data set and the test data set are mixed with noise, the recognition rate reaches 89.93%. The best recognition accuracy is achieved when the size of the training set is taken as 400. The algorithm complexity can meet the requirements of real-time recognition.

Key words: quasi-linear frequency modulation (quasi-LFM) radar waveform, time-frequency distribution, fractional Fourier transform (FrFT), assembled classifier

. [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32(5): 1130-1142.

Cunxiang XIE, Limin ZHANG, Zhaogen ZHONG. Quasi-LFM radar waveform recognition based on fractional Fourier transform and time-frequency analysis[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32(5): 1130-1142.

图/表 15

参考文献 34

1	QU Z Y, WANG W Y, HOU C B, et al Radar signal intra-pulse modulation recognition based on convolutional denoising autoencoder and deep convolutional neural network. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 112339- 112347. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935247
2	THOKALA R K, DEERGHA R K Automatic intrapulse modulation classification of advanced LPI radar waveforms. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2017, 53 (2): 901- 914. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2017.2667142
3	LI D J, YANG R J, LI X B, et al Radar signal modulation recognition based on deep joint learning. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 48515- 48528. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978875
4	NANDI A K, AZZOUZ E E Algorithms for automatic modulation recognition of communication signals. IEEE Trans. on Communications, 1998, 46 (4): 431- 436. doi: 10.1109/26.664294
5	NANDI A K, AZZOUZ E E Automatic analogue modulation recognition. Signal Processing, 1995, 46 (2): 211- 222. doi: 10.1016/0165-1684(95)00083-P
6	RAVIER P, AMBLARD P O Wavelet packets and de-noising based on higher-order-statistics for transient detection. Signal Processing, 2001, 81 (9): 1909- 1926. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1684(01)00088-3
7	SWAMI A, SADLER B M Hierarchical digital modulation classification using cumulants. IEEE Trans. on Communications, 2000, 48 (3): 416- 429. doi: 10.1109/26.837045
8	DOBRE O A, BARNESS Y, SU W Higher-order cyclic cumulants for high order modulation classification. Proc. of the Military Communications Conference, 2003, 112- 117.
9	LIU L T, DAI L J, CHEN T Radar signal modulation recognition based on spectrum complexity. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2018, 39 (6): 1081- 1086.
10	ZHANG Y X, HONG R J, PAN P P, et al Frequency-domain range sidelobe correction in stretch processing for wideband LFM radars. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2017, 53 (1): 111- 121. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2017.2649278
11	MA J, HUANG G, MZUO W, et al Robust radar waveform recognition algorithm based on random projections and sparse classification. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigatation, 2014, 8 (4): 290- 296.
12	LOPEZ-RISUENO G, GRAJAL J, SANZ-OSORIO A Digital channelized receiver based on time-frequency analysis for signal interception. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2005, 41 (3): 879- 898. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2005.1541437
13	LOPEZ-RISUENO G, GRAJAL J, YESTE-OJEDA O Atomic decomposition-based radar complex signal interception. IEE Proceedings—Radar, Sonar and Navigation, 2003, 150 (4): 323- 331. doi: 10.1049/ip-rsn:20030680
14	HUANG Y, LIU F, WANG Z Z Chirp function sparse feature extraction and sorting of radar signals based on FRFT. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34 (2): 393- 400.
15	QU Z Y, MAO X J, HOU C B Radar signal recognition based on singular value entropy and fractal dimension. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40 (2): 303- 307.
16	ZHANG M, LIU L T, DIAO M LPI radar waveform recognition based on time-frequency distribution. Sensors, 2016, 16 (10): 1682. doi: 10.3390/s16101682
17	LI Y J, XIAO P, WU H C, et al LPI radar signal detection based on radial integration of Choi-Williams time-frequency image. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 26 (5): 973- 981. doi: 10.1109/JSEE.2015.00106
18	LECUN Y, BENGIO Y, HINTO G Deep learning. Nature, 2015, 521 (7553): 436- 444. doi: 10.1038/nature14539
19	O’SHEA T, HOYDIS J An introduction to deep learning for the physical layer. IEEE Trans. on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 2017, 3 (4): 563- 575. doi: 10.1109/TCCN.2017.2758370
20	LAWRENCE S, GILES C L, TSOI A C, et al Face recognition: a convolutional neural network approach. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, 1997, 8 (1): 98- 113. doi: 10.1109/72.554195
21	LECUN Y, HUANG F J, BOTTOU L Learning methods for generic object recognition with invariance to pose and lighting. Proc. of the IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004, 2, 97- 104.
22	ABDEL-HAMID O, MOHAMED A R, JIANG H, et al. Applying convolutional neural networks concepts to hybrid NN-HMM model for speech recognition. Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, 2012: 4277−4280.
23	ABDEL-HAMID O, MOHAMED A R, JIANG H, et al Convolutional neural networks for speech recognition. IEEE/ACM Trans. on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 2014, 22 (10): 1533- 1545. doi: 10.1109/TASLP.2014.2339736
24	LIN T Y, ROYCHOWDHURY A, MAJI S. Bilinear CNN models for fine-grained visual recognition. Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2015: 1449−1457.
25	NIU X X, SUEN C Y A novel hybrid CNN–SVM classifier for recognizing handwritten digits. Pattern Recognition, 2012, 45 (4): 1318- 1325. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2011.09.021
26	ZHAN M, DIAO M, GUO L M Convolutional neural networks for automatic cognitive radio waveform recognition. IEEE Access, 2017, 5, 11074- 11082. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2716191
27	PACE P E. Detecting and classifying low probability of intercept radar. 3rd ed. New York: Artech House, 2009.
28	DENG B, WANG X, TAO R, et al Performance analysis of time delay estimation for linear frequency-modulated pulse based on fractional Fourier transform. Acta Armamentarii, 2012, 33 (6): 764- 768.
29	ALMEIDA L B The fractional Fourier transform and time-frequency representation. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 1994, 42 (11): 3084- 3091. doi: 10.1109/78.330368
30	LUNDEN J, TERHO L, KOIVUNEN V. Classifying pulse compression radar waveforms using time-frequency distributions. Proc. of the 39th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, 2005: 1−6.
31	MONTAVON G, SAMEK M, MULLER K R Methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks. Digital Signal Processing, 2018, 73, 1- 15. doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2017.10.011
32	WANG Y C, HU Z Y, ZHANG Y F Digital modulated signal recognition based on spectral correlation and assembled neural network. Application Research of Computers, 2009, 26 (11): 4234- 4236.
33	WANG H J, NEIMULE M, JIN T. Application of adaptive genetic BP model in classification of speech characteristic signal. Proc. of the 2nd IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference, 2018: 1429−1433.
34	MILLER M F A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Networks, 1993, 6 (4): 525- 533. doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80056-5

Code type	Definition of ${\phi _i}$
LFM	$\phi = {\text{π}}\mu {t^2}$
Frank	${\phi _{mn}} = 2{\text{π}}\left( {m - 1} \right)\left( {n - 1} \right)/M$
P1	${\phi _{mn}} = - {\text{π}}\left[ {M - \left( {2n - 1} \right)} \right]\left[ {\left( {n - 1} \right)M + \left( {m - 1} \right)} \right]/M$
P2	${\phi _{mn} } = - {\text{π} }\left( {2n - 1 - M} \right)\left( {2m - 1 - M} \right)/ {2M}$
P3	${\phi _k} = {\text{π}}{\left( {k - 1} \right)^2}/{N_c}$
P4	${\phi _k} = {\text{π}}{\left( {k - 1} \right)^2}/{N_c} - {\text{π}}\left( {k - 1} \right)$

Quasi-LFM radar waveform recognition based on fractional Fourier transform and time-frequency analysis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 34

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价