
Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 1268-1280.doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2022.000120
• RELIABILITY • Previous Articles
					
													Weining MA1, Fei ZHAO1,2,3,*(
), Xin LI3, Qiwei HU1, Bingcong SHANG2,3
												  
						
						
						
					
				
Received:2021-04-07
															
							
															
							
															
							
																	Online:2022-10-27
															
							
																	Published:2022-10-27
															
						Contact:
								Fei ZHAO   
																	E-mail:zhaofeiaeu@163.com
																					About author:Supported by:Weining MA, Fei ZHAO, Xin LI, Qiwei HU, Bingcong SHANG. Joint optimization of inspection-based and age-based preventive maintenance and spare ordering policies for single-unit systems[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(5): 1268-1280.
Table 1
Renewal events of the proposed policy"
| Renewal  scenario  |  Whether  |    |  Availability of the ordered spare | Decision-  making  |  |
| A failure renewal | No | — | — | ER | |
| Yes | Yes | No | DR | ||
| Yes | IR | ||||
| No | No | DR | |||
| Yes | IR | ||||
| An age-replacement renewal at  |  The system is in the state  |  No | — | — | ER | 
| Yes | No | No | DR | ||
| Yes | IR | ||||
| The system is in the state  |  No | — | — | ER | |
| Yes | Yes | No | DR | ||
| Yes | IR | ||||
| No | No | DR | |||
| Yes | IR | ||||
| The system is in the state  |  No | — | — | ER | |
| Yes | Yes | No | DR | ||
| Yes | IR | ||||
| No | No | DR | |||
| Yes | IR | ||||
| An inspection renewal after the number of IPM reaches the pre-specified threshold | No | — | — | ER | |
| Yes | Yes | No | DR | ||
| Yes | IR | ||||
| No | No | DR | |||
| Yes | IR | ||||
| 1 | AHMAD R, KAMARUDDIN S An overview of time-based and condition-based maintenance in industrial application. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2012, 63 (1): 135- 149. | 
| 2 |  
											CAVALCANTE C A, LOPES R S, SCARF P A A general inspection and opportunistic replacement policy for one-component systems of variable quality. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 266 (3): 911- 919. 
																							 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.032  | 
										
| 3 | JIANG R Performance evaluation of seven optimization models of age replacement policy. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2018, 180, 302- 311. | 
| 4 |  
											WANG L, HU H J, WANG Y Q, et al The availability model and parameters estimation method for the delay time model with imperfect maintenance at inspection. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011, 35 (6): 2855- 2863. 
																							 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.11.070  | 
										
| 5 |  
											AHMADI R Optimal maintenance scheduling for a complex manufacturing system subject to deterioration. Annals of Operations Research, 2014, 217 (1): 1- 29. 
																							 doi: 10.1007/s10479-014-1543-4  | 
										
| 6 | DO P, VOISIN A, LEVRAT E, et al A proactive condition-based maintenance strategy with both perfect and imperfect maintenance actions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 133, 22- 32. | 
| 7 |  
											YANG L, YE Z S, LEE C G, et al A two-phase preventive maintenance policy considering imperfect repair and postponed replacement. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 274 (3): 966- 977. 
																							 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.10.049  | 
										
| 8 |  
											MALIK M A K Reliable preventive maintenance scheduling. AIIE Transactions, 1979, 11 (3): 221- 228. 
																							 doi: 10.1080/05695557908974463  | 
										
| 9 |  
											PHAM H, WANG H Imperfect maintenance. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 94 (3): 425- 438. 
																							 doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00099-9  | 
										
| 10 | BISWAS A, SARKAR J Availability of a system maintained through several imperfect repairs before a replacement or a perfect repair. Statistics & Probability Letters, 2000, 50 (2): 105- 114. | 
| 11 |  
											BISWAS A, SARKAR J, SARKAR S Availability of a periodically inspected system, maintained under an imperfect-repair policy. IEEE Trans. on Reliability, 2003, 52 (3): 311- 318. 
																							 doi: 10.1109/TR.2003.818716  | 
										
| 12 | WEIDE J, PANDEY M D Stochastic analysis of shock process and modeling of condition-based maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2011, 96 (6): 619- 626. | 
| 13 | WEIDE J, PANDEY M D, NOORTWIJK J Discounted cost model for condition-based maintenance optimization. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2010, 95 (3): 236- 246. | 
| 14 |  
											OSAKI S, YAMADA S Age replacement with lead time. IEEE Trans. on Reliability, 1976, R-25 (5): 344- 345. 
																							 doi: 10.1109/TR.1976.5220037  | 
										
| 15 |  
											SHEU S H, GRIFFITH W S Optimal age-replacement policy with age-dependent minimal-repair and random-leadtime. IEEE Trans. on Reliability, 2001, 50 (3): 302- 309. 
																							 doi: 10.1109/24.974128  | 
										
| 16 |  
											SHEU S H, CHIEN Y H Optimal age-replacement policy of a system subject to shocks with random lead-time. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 159 (1): 132- 144. 
																							 doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00409-0  | 
										
| 17 | SHEU S H, ZHANG Z G, CHIEN Y H, et al Age replacement policy with lead-time for a system subject to non-homogeneous pure birth shocks. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37 (14/15): 7717- 7725. | 
| 18 |  
											CHIEN Y H, CHANG C C, SHEU S H Optimal age-replacement model with age-dependent type of failure and random lead time based on a cumulative repair-cost limit policy. Annals of Operations Research, 2010, 181 (1): 723- 744. 
																							 doi: 10.1007/s10479-009-0679-0  | 
										
| 19 |  
											CHIEN Y H, SHEU S H, CHANG C C Optimal age-replacement time with minimal repair based on cumulative repair cost limit and random lead time. International Journal of Systems Science, 2009, 40 (7): 703- 715. 
																							 doi: 10.1080/00207720902953144  | 
										
| 20 |  
											ARMSTRONG M J, ATKINS D R Joint optimization of maintenance and inventory policies for a simple system. IIE Transactions, 1996, 28 (5): 415- 424. 
																							 doi: 10.1080/07408179608966288  | 
										
| 21 |  
											WANG L, CHU J, MAO W J A condition-based order-replacement policy for a single-unit system. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2008, 32 (11): 2274- 2289. 
																							 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2007.07.016  | 
										
| 22 |  
											ZHOU W, WANG D F, SHENG J Y, et al Collaborative optimization of maintenance and spare ordering of continuously degrading systems. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 23 (1): 63- 70. 
																							 doi: 10.1109/JSEE.2012.00009  | 
										
| 23 | ALASWAD S, XIANG Y A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2017, 157, 54- 63. | 
| 24 |  
											BLOCH-MERCIER S A preventive maintenance policy with sequential checking procedure for a Markov deteriorating system. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 142 (3): 548- 576. 
																							 doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00310-1  | 
										
| 25 | KANG K C, SUBRAMANIAM V Integrated control policy of production and preventive maintenance for a deteriorating manufacturing system. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2018, 118, 266- 277. | 
| 26 | MOGHADDASS R, ERTEKIN E Joint optimization of ordering and maintenance with condition monitoring data. Annals of Operations Research, 2018, 263 (1/2): 271- 310. | 
| 27 | WANG W B An inspection model based on a three-stage failure process. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2011, 96 (7): 838- 848. | 
| 28 | BERRADE M D, SCARF P A, CAVALCANTE C A V A study of postponed replacement in a delay time model. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2017, 168, 70- 79. | 
| 29 | YANG L, MA X B, ZHAO Y A condition-based maintenance model for a three-state system subject to degradation and environmental shocks. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2017, 105, 210- 222. | 
| 30 |  
											TAGHIPOUR S, AZIMPOOR S Joint optimization of jobs sequence and inspection policy for a single system with two-stage failure process. IEEE Trans. on Reliability, 2018, 67 (1): 156- 169. 
																							 doi: 10.1109/TR.2017.2775958  | 
										
| 31 |  
											CHRISTER A H, WANG W, CHOI K, et al The robustness of the semi-Markov and delay time single-component inspection models to the markov assumption. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 2001, 12 (1): 75- 88. 
																							 doi: 10.1093/imaman/12.1.75  | 
										
| 32 | WANG W B An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modelling. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2012, 106 (5): 165- 178. | 
| 33 |  
											WANG W, SCARF P A, SMITH M A J On the application of a model of condition-based maintenance. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2000, 51 (11): 1218- 1227. 
																							 doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601042  | 
										
| 34 | WANG W B, ZHAO F, PENG R A preventive maintenance model with a two-level inspection policy based on a three-stage failure process. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2014, 121 (1): 207- 220. | 
| 35 | WANG H Y, WANG W B, PENG R A two-phase inspection model for a single component system with three-stage degradation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2017, 158, 31- 40. | 
| 36 | WANG W B A joint spare part and maintenance inspection optimization model using the delay-time concept. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2011, 96 (11): 1535- 1541. | 
| 37 | WANG W B, SYNTETOS A A Spare parts demand: linking forecasting to equipment maintenance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics & Transportation Review, 2011, 47 (6): 1194- 1209. | 
| 38 |  
											WANG W B A stochastic model for joint spare parts inventory and planned maintenance optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 216 (1): 127- 139. 
																							 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.031  | 
										
| 39 | SHI C H, XIE F F, ZHAO F, et al A joint inspection-based preventive maintenance and spare ordering optimization policy using a three-stage failure process. Complexity, 2017, 2017, 1- 19. | 
| 40 | ZHAO F, LIU X J, PENG R, et al Joint optimization of inspection and spare ordering policy with multi-level defect information. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 139, 106205. | 
| 41 |  
											YEH R H, CHANG W L, LO H C Optimal threshold values of age and two-phase maintenance policy for leased equipments using age reduction method. Annals of Operations Research, 2010, 181 (1): 171- 183. 
																							 doi: 10.1007/s10479-010-0713-2  | 
										
| 42 |  
											CAI J, LI X, CHEN X Joint optimization of maintenance inspection and spare provisioning for aircraft deteriorating parts. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 28 (6): 1133- 1140. 
																							 doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2017.06.11  | 
										
| 43 | ROSS S M Introduction to probability models. London: Academic Press, 2015. | 
| [1] | Jingfeng LI, Yunxiang CHEN, Zhongyi CAI, Zezhou WANG. A dynamic condition-based maintenance optimization model for mission-oriented system based on inverse Gaussian degradation process [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(2): 474-488. | 
| [2] | Mengying HAN, Jianhua YANG, Xiao ZHAO. Joint optimization of inspection, maintenance, and spare ordering policy considering defective products loss [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32(5): 1167-1179. | 
| [3] | Wei Zhou, Dongfeng Wang, Jingyu Sheng, and Bo Guo. Collaborative optimization of maintenance and spare ordering of continuously degrading systems [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 23(1): 63-70. | 
| [4] | Changyou Li, Minqiang Xu, Song Guo, and Rixin Wang. Multiobjective maintenance optimization of the continuously monitored deterioration system [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 21(5): 791-795. | 
| Viewed | ||||||
| 
										Full text | 
									
										 | 
								|||||
| 
										Abstract | 
									
										 | 
								|||||