Threat sequencing of multiple UCAVs with incomplete information based on game theory

doi:10.23919/JSEE.2022.000095

Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 986-996.doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2022.000095

收稿日期:2021-06-03 接受日期:2022-06-09 出版日期:2022-08-30 发布日期:2022-08-30

Threat sequencing of multiple UCAVs with incomplete information based on game theory

Shouyi LI(), Mou CHEN*(), Qingxian WU(), Yuhui WANG()

¹ College of Automation Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, China

Received:2021-06-03 Accepted:2022-06-09 Online:2022-08-30 Published:2022-08-30
Contact: Mou CHEN E-mail:shouyili@163.com;chenmou@nuaa.edu.cn;wuqingxian@nuaa.edu.cn;wangyh@nuaa.edu.cn
About author:|LI Shouyi was born in 1991. He received his B.S. degree in mathematics and applied mathematics from Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China, in 2014. He is currently pursuing his Ph.D. degree in control theory and control engineering, with Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics. His research interests include fire and command control, game theory, reinforcement learning, and their applications in autonomous decision-making system. E-mail: shouyili@163.com||CHEN Mou was born in 1975. He received his B.S. degree in material science and engineering and Ph.D. degree in control theory and control engineering from Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (NUAA), in 1998 and 2004, respectively. He is currently a full professor with the College of Automation Engineering, NUAA. His current research interests include nonlinear system control, intelligent control, and flight control. E-mail: chenmou@nuaa.edu.cn||WU Qingxian was born in 1955. He obtained his M.S. degree in control theory and application from Southeast University, Nanjing, China, in 1985. Currently, he is a professor and Ph.D. supervisor at Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics. His main research fields are industrial automation, robust control, and intelligent control. E-mail: wuqingxian@nuaa.edu.cn||WANG Yuhui was born in 1980. She received her B.S. degree in electrical engineering and its automation from University of Ji’nan, Ji’nan, China, in 2001, and Ph.D. degree in control theory and control engineering from Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (NUAA), Nanjing, China, in 2008. She is currently a full professor with the College of Automation Engineering, NUAA. Her current research interests include nonlinear system control, intelligent control, and flight control. E-mail: wangyh@nuaa.edu.cn
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Major Projects for Science and Technology Innovation 2030 (2018AAA0100805)

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

The threat sequencing of multiple unmanned combat air vehicles (UCAVs) is a multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) problem. In the threat sequencing process of multiple UCAVs, due to the strong confrontation and high dynamics of the air combat environment, the weight coefficients of the threat indicators are usually time-varying. Moreover, the air combat data is difficult to be obtained accurately. In this study, a threat sequencing method of multiple UCAVs is proposed based on game theory by considering the incomplete information. Firstly, a zero-sum game model of decision maker ( $\mathcal{D}$ ) and nature ( $\mathcal{N}$ ) with fuzzy payoffs is established to obtain the uncertain parameters which are the weight coefficient parameters of the threat indicators and the interval parameters of the threat matrix. Then, the established zero-sum game with fuzzy payoffs is transformed into a zero-sum game with crisp payoffs (matrix game) to solve. Moreover, a decision rule is addressed for the threat sequencing problem of multiple UCAVs based on the obtained uncertain parameters. Finally, numerical simulation results are presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Key words: threat sequencing, multiple unmanned combat air vehicles (UCAVs), multi-attribute decision-making (MADM), game theory, incomplete information

. [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(4): 986-996.

Shouyi LI, Mou CHEN, Qingxian WU, Yuhui WANG. Threat sequencing of multiple UCAVs with incomplete information based on game theory[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(4): 986-996.

图/表 4

参考文献 37

1	LI Y, QIU X H, LIU X D, et al Deep reinforcement learning and its application in autonomous fitting optimization for attack areas of UCAVs. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 31 (4): 734- 742. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2020.000048
2	ZHOU R H, SUN H M, LI H, et al TDOA and track optimization of UAV swarm based on D-optimality. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 31 (6): 1140- 1151. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2020.000086
3	WANG L H, HU J W, XU Z, et al Autonomous maneuver strategy of swarm air combat based on DDPG. Autonomous Intelligent Systems, 2021, 1 (1): 15. doi: 10.1007/s43684-021-00013-z
4	BACCI D, SADDINGTON A J, BRAY D The effect of angle of attack on the aeroacoustic environment within the weapons bay of a generic UCAV. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 93, 105315. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105315
5	LI S Y, CHEN M, WANG Y H, et al Air combat decision-making of multiple UCAVs based on constraint strategy games. Defence Technology, 2022, 18 (3): 368- 383. doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2021.01.005
6	ZAKERI S, CHATTERJEE P, CHEIKHROUHOU N, et al Ranking based on optimal points and win-loss-draw multi-criteria decision-making with application to supplier evaluation problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, 191 (4): 116258.
7	LIU C, SUN S S, TAO C G, et al. Sliding mode control of multi-agent system with application to UAV air combat. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2021, 96(Part A): 107491.
8	ZHANG J D, YANG Q M, SHI G Q, et al UAV cooperative air combat maneuver decision based on multi-agent reinforcement learning. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32 (6): 1421- 1438. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2021.000121
9	REN Y, ZHU P C, ZHAO Z J, et al. Adaptive fault-tolerant boundary control for a flexible string with unknown dead zone and actuator fault. IEEE Trans. on Cybernetics, 2021, 32(6): 1421−1438.
10	XU Z S Multiple-attribute group decision making with different formats of preference information on attributes. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 2007, 37 (6): 1500- 1511. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2007.904832
11	RANCHER C, SMITH D W, ORENGO R, et al Measurement invariance of caregiver support following sexual abuse across age, relationship, and English-Spanish language. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2022, 125 (3): 105488.
12	MOKARRARI K R, TORABI S A Ranking cities based on their smartness level using MADM methods. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021, 72 (9): 103030.
13	MOHAMMED H J, DAHAM H A Analytic hierarchy process for evaluating flipped classroom learning. CMC-Computers, Materials & Continua, 2021, 66 (3): 2229- 2239.
14	ZHU X X, WANG Q The integration information entropy method for the hybrid multi-attribute decision-making. Proc. of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2010, 4, 1787- 1792.
15	LIU J P, CHEN H Y, ZHOU L G, et al Generalized linguistic ordered weighted hybrid logarithm averaging operators and applications to group decision making. International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness & Knowledge Based Systems, 2015, 23 (3): 421- 442.
16	ZHOU K, LI D J, CUI A J, et al Sparse flight spotlight mode 3-D imaging of spaceborne SAR based on sparse spectrum and principal component analysis. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32 (5): 1143- 1151. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2021.000098
17	ZHOU L G, CHEN H Y, LIU J P Generalized logarithmic proportional averaging operators and their applications to group decision making. Knowledge Based Systems, 2012, 36 (12): 268- 279.
18	WANG Q Q, ZHAO D F, YANG B, et al Risk assessment of the UPIoT construction in china using combined dynamic weighting method under IFGDM environment. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 60 (9): 102199.
19	VON NEUMANN J, MORGENSTERN O. The theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1944.
20	MA Y, CHANG T Q, FAN W H A single-task and multi-decision evolutionary game model based on multi-agent reinforcement learning. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32 (3): 642- 657. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2021.000055
21	LIANG X Q, YAN Z, DENG R H, et al Investigating the adoption of hybrid encrypted cloud data deduplication with game theory. IEEE Trans. on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2020, 32 (3): 587- 600.
22	CHIVUKULA A, YANG X H, LIU W, et al Game theoretical adversarial deep learning with variational adversaries. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2021, 33 (11): 3568- 3581. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2020.2972320
23	AUSTIN F, CARBONE G, HINZ H, et al Game theory for automated maneuvering during air-to-air combat. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 1990, 13 (6): 1143- 1149. doi: 10.2514/3.20590
24	ZHANG G P, YANG K, PENG L, et al Achieving user cooperation diversity in TDMA-based wireless networks using cooperative game theory. IEEE Communications Letters, 2011, 15 (2): 154- 156. doi: 10.1109/LCOMM.2011.122010.100629
25	COLOMBO L, LABRECCIOSA P A stochastic differential game of duopolistic competition with sticky prices. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2021, 122, 104030. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2020.104030
26	CHEN Y W, LARBANI M Two-person zero-sum game approach for fuzzy multiple attribute decision making problems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2006, 157 (1): 34- 51. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2005.06.004
27	DONG Y F, FENG J L, ZHANG H X Cooperative tactical decision methods for multi-aircraft air combat simulation. Journal of System Simulation, 2002, 14 (6): 723- 725.
28	JIANG C S, DING Q X, WANG J G, et al Research on threat assessment and target distribution for multi-aircraft cooperative air combat. Fire Control and Command Control, 2008, 33 (11): 8- 12, 21.
29	XU X M, YANG R N, YU Y. Threat assessment in air combat based on ELM neural network. Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Applications , 2019: 114–120.
30	LI S Y, WU Q X, CHEN M, et al. Air combat situation assessment of multiple UCAVs with incomplete information. Proc. of the Chinese Intelligent Systems Conference, 2021: 18–26.
31	BUCKLEY B, JOWERS L. Monte Carlo methods in fuzzy optimization. Berlin: Springer, 2008.
32	YING H. Basic fuzzy mathematics for fuzzy control and modeling. Piscataway: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2009.
33	MASCHLER M, SOLAN E, ZAMIR S. Game theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
34	PARTHASARATHY T, RAGHAVAN T E S. Some topics in two-person games. Maryland Heights: Elsevier, 1917.
35	MANSOORI A, ESHAGHNEZHAD M, EFFATI S Recurrent neural network model: a new strategy to solve fuzzy matrix games. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2019, 30 (8): 2538- 2547. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2885825
36	XIE Z. Introduction to game theory. Beijing: Science Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
37	DUGENCI M A new distance measure for interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to group decision making problems with incomplete weights information. Applied Soft Computing, 2016, 41 (4): 120- 134.

Symbol	Description	${\boldsymbol{B}_1}$	${\boldsymbol{B}_2}$	${\boldsymbol{B}_3}$	${\boldsymbol{B}_4}$	${ {{\boldsymbol{R}}}_0}$
${p_{ix}}$ /km	$X$ coordinate of position	[?14,?12]	[21,23]	[?17,?15]	[17,19]	0
${p_{iy}}$ /km	$Y$ coordinate of position	[21,24]	[?17,?14]	[16,19]	[?15,?12]	0
${p_{iz}}$ /km	$Z$ coordinate of position	[12,14]	[21,23]	[?4,?3]	[22,24]	0
${v_{ix}}$ /(km·h^?1)	$X$ coordinate of speed	[35,37]	[?56,?52]	[83,87]	[53,58]	[91,97]
${v_{iy}}$ /(km·h^?1)	$Y$ coordinate of speed	[56,59]	[93 98]	[73,78]	[84,87]	[61,64]
${v_{iz}}$ /(km·h^?1)	$Z$ coordinate of speed	[53,56]	[71,73]	[84,88]	[94,97]	[37,40]
${m_i}$ /km	Missile attack distance	[30,33]	[31,34]	[29,31]	[26,28]	[42,44]
${r_i}$ /km	Radar detection distance	[81,87]	[82,89]	[90,94]	[84,87]	[91,98]
$\varepsilon _i^m$	Maneuverability performance	[1.3,1.5]	[1.5,1.6]	[2.4,2.6]	[1.4,1.6]	?
$\varepsilon _i^f$	Firepower performance	[0.4,0.5]	[0.7,0.9]	[0.6,0.7]	[0.5,0.6]	?
$\varepsilon _i^d$	Detection performance	[0.8,0.9]	[0.4,0.5]	[0.6,0.8]	[0.7,0.9]	?
$\varepsilon _i^h$	Handling performance	[0.6,0.7]	[0.5,0,6]	[0.3,0.4]	[0.4,0.5]	?
$\varepsilon _i^s$	Survival performance	[0.4,0.5]	[0.7,0.8]	[0.4,0.6]	[0.5,0.6]	?
$\varepsilon _i^v$	Voyage coefficient	[0.3,0.5]	[0.6,0.7]	[0.5,0.6]	[0.4,0.5]	?
$\varepsilon _i^e$	Electronic countermeasure performance	[0.3,0.4]	[0.5,0.6]	[0.7,0.9]	[0.4,0.5]	?

Threat sequencing of multiple UCAVs with incomplete information based on game theory

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 37

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价