|1||CHENG C, YANG M Creative process engagement and new product performance: the role of new product development speed and leadership encouragement of creativity. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 99 (7): 215- 225.|
VERONA G A resource-based view of product development. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24 (1): 132- 142.
BAKAR L J A, AHMAD H Assessing the relationship between firm resources and product innovation performance: a resource-based view. Business Process Management Journal, 2010, 16 (3): 420- 435.
|4||ZHOU K Z, WU F Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31 (5): 547- 561.|
CETINDAMAR D, PHAAL R, PROBERT D Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: a framework for technology management activities. Technovation, 2009, 29 (4): 237- 246.
WU W W, YU B, WU C How China’s equipment manufacturing firms achieve successful independent innovation: the double helix mode of technological capability and technology management. Chinese Management Studies, 2012, 6 (1): 160- 183.
LIU Y X, WU W W, GAO P B, et al Exploring the different combinations of technological capability and technology management capability in different stages of new product development. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 181012- 181021.
COOPER R G What’s next?: after stage-gate. Research-Technology Management, 2014, 57 (1): 20- 31.
DREJER A The discipline of management of technology, based on considerations related to technology. Technovation, 1997, 17 (5): 253- 265.
|10||National Research Council. Management of technology: the hidden competitive advantage. Washington, D.C., U.S.: National Academy Press, 1987.|
LIAO S S Technology management methodologies and applications: a literature review from 1995 to 2003. Technovation, 2005, 25 (4): 381- 393.
PHAAL R, FARRUKH C J P, PROBERT D R A framework for supporting the management of technological knowledge. International Journal of Technology Management, 2004, 27 (1): 1- 15.
KANG T, BAEK C, LEE J D The persistency and volatility of the firm R&D investment: revisited from the perspective of technological capability. Research Policy, 2017, 46 (9): 1570- 1579.
|14||AYDIN H Market orientation and product innovation: the mediating role of technological capability. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2020, 24 (4): 1233- 1267.|
WU J Cooperation with competitors and product innovation: Moderating effects of technological capability and alliances with universities. Industrial Marketing Management, 2014, 43 (2): 199- 209.
MA Q, WU W W, LIU Y X The fit between technology management and technological capability and its impact on new product development performance. Sustainability, 2021, 13 (19): 10956.
|17||LIU Y X, WU W W, WANG Y The impacts of technology management on product innovation: the role of technological capability. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 210722- 210732.|
|18||COOPER R G, SOMMER A F Agile-Stage-Gate for manufacturers: changing the way new products are developed integrating agile project management methods into a Stage-Gate system offers both opportunities and challenges. Research-Technology Management, 2018, 61 (2): 17- 26.|
ERNST H, HOYER W D, RUBSAAMEN C Sales, marketing, and research-and-development cooperation across new product development stages: implications for success. Journal of Marketing, 2010, 74 (5): 80- 92.
|20||GENC E, DI BENEDETTO C A Cross-functional integration in the sustainable new product development process: the role of the environmental specialist. Industrial Marketing Management, 2015, 50 (10): 150- 161.|
TROY L C, HIRUNYAWIPADA T, PASWAN A K Cross-functional integration and new product success: an empirical investigation of the findings. Journal of Marketing, 2008, 72 (6): 132- 146.
SONG X M, PARRY M E The R&D-marketing interface in Japanese high-technology firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1992, 9 (2): 91- 112.
POLES R System dynamics modelling of a production and inventory system for remanufacturing to evaluate system improvement strategies. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 144 (1): 189- 199.
|24||RUUTU S, CASEY T, KOTOVIRTA V Development and competition of digital service platforms: a system dynamics approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 117 (4): 119- 130.|
WU D D, KEFAN X, HUA L, et al Modeling technological innovation risks of an entrepreneurial team using system dynamics: an agent-based perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2010, 77 (6): 857- 869.
|26||HSIEH Y H, CHOU Y H Modeling the impact of service innovation for small and medium enterprises: a system dynamics approach. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2018, 82 (3): 84- 102.|
YEON S J, PARK S H, KIM S W A dynamic diffusion model for managing customer’s expectation and satisfaction. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2006, 73 (6): 648- 665.
|28||SCHWEITZER F, ZHANG Y, CASIRAGHI G Intervention scenarios to enhance knowledge transfer in a network of firms. Frontiers in Physics, 2020, 8 (9): 382.|
|||Weiwei WU, Qian MA, Yexin LIU, Ying YANG, Suzhen YUE. Evolution of technology management system based on self-organization theory [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32(6): 1439-1449.|
Weiwei Wu, Bo Yu, and Jian Wang.
Dynamic models of technology management capability
development based on knowledge diffusion [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 22(2): 228-237.