Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 105-119.doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2022.000012
• SYSTEMS ENGINEERING • Previous Articles Next Articles
Qian MA1,2(
), Weiwei WU1(), Yexin LIU3,*(), Zhou LIANG1(), Lingzhi KOU1()
Received:2021-08-27
Accepted:2022-02-11
Online:2022-01-18
Published:2022-02-22
Contact:
Yexin LIU
E-mail:164164851@qq.com;wuweiwei@hit.edu.cn;liuyexin1990@163.com;810164900@qq.com;360876639@qq.com
About author:Supported by:Qian MA, Weiwei WU, Yexin LIU, Zhou LIANG, Lingzhi KOU. Impact of the synergy between technology management and technological capability on new product development: a system dynamics approach[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(1): 105-119.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Fig 1
Causal loop diagram of the synergy process in concept development stage"
Fig 2
Causal loop diagram of the synergy process in product development stage"
Fig 3
Causal loop diagram of the synergy process in market development stage"
Fig 4
Stock-flow diagram of the synergy process in concept development stage"
Fig 5
Stock-flow diagram of the synergy process in product development stage"
Fig 6
Stock-flow diagram of the synergy process in market development stage"
Table 1
Variable types and initial values"
| Variable name | Variable type | Initial value |
| Knowledge stock of human capability subsystem | Stock | 1 |
| Human knowledge increasing | Flow | — |
| Human knowledge decreasing | Flow | — |
| Decreasing rate of human knowledge | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
| Knowledge increasing rate of human capability subsystem | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Human resource management capability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Incentive mechanism | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Knowledge stock of information capability subsystem | Stock | 1 |
| Information knowledge increasing | Flow | — |
| Information knowledge decreasing | Flow | — |
| Decreasing rate of information knowledge | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
| Knowledge increasing rate of information capability subsystem | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Information management capability | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Technology information transmission channel | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Information technology knowledge system | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Organization communication mechanism | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| External public relations | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Knowledge stock of equipment capability subsystem | Stock | 1 |
| Equipment knowledge increasing | Flow | — |
| Equipment knowledge decreasing | Flow | — |
| Decreasing rate of equipment knowledge | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
| Knowledge increasing rate of equipment capability subsystem | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Equipment management regulations | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Number of advanced equipment introduction | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Knowledge stock of organization capability subsystem | Stock | 1 |
| Organization knowledge increasing | Flow | — |
| Organization knowledge decreasing | Flow | — |
| Decreasing rate of organization knowledge | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
| Knowledge increasing rate of organization capability subsystem | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Management coordination ability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Internal and external environment adaptability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Department cooperation ability | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Risk-control mechanism | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Knowledge stock of technology management subsystem | Stock | 1 |
| Management knowledge increasing | Flow | — |
| Management knowledge decreasing | Flow | — |
| Decreasing rate of management knowledge | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
| Knowledge increasing rate of technology management system | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Technology resource management capability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Technology organization management capability | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Technology quality management capability | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Material management capability | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Number of new product development ideas | Stock | 1 |
| Ideas increasing | Flow | — |
| Ideas decreasing | Flow | — |
| Elimination rate | Auxiliary variable | 0.85 |
| Increasing rate | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Team innovation ability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Input in innovation ideas | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Top management support | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Investment in new product development | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Leading degree of product technology | Stock | 1 |
| Leading degree increasing | Flow | — |
| Leading degree decreasing | Flow | 0.1 |
| Increasing rate of leading degree | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Investment in technology development | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Team technology level | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Decreasing rate of leading degree | Auxiliary variable | — |
| New product development cycle | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Market competition | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Profit | Stock | 1 |
| Change in sales | Flow | — |
| Change in cost | Flow | — |
| Changing rate of sales | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Changing rate of cost | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Marketing capability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Leading degree of product technology | Auxiliary variable | 1 |
| Synergy between technology management and human capability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Synergy between technology management and information capability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Synergy between technology management and equipment capability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Synergy between technology management and organization capability | Auxiliary variable | — |
| Willness of synergy between technology management and human capability | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
| Willness of synergy between technology management and information capability | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
| Willness of synergy between technology management and equipment capability | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
| Willness of synergy between technology management and organization capability | Auxiliary variable | 0.1 |
Fig 7
"
Fig 7
Simulation results of impact of synergy between technology management and technological capability on new product development"
Fig 8
Simulation results of the leading synergy processes in different new product development stages"
| 1 | CHENG C, YANG M Creative process engagement and new product performance: the role of new product development speed and leadership encouragement of creativity. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 99 (7): 215- 225. |
| 2 |
VERONA G A resource-based view of product development. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24 (1): 132- 142.
doi: 10.5465/amr.1999.1580445 |
| 3 |
BAKAR L J A, AHMAD H Assessing the relationship between firm resources and product innovation performance: a resource-based view. Business Process Management Journal, 2010, 16 (3): 420- 435.
doi: 10.1108/14637151011049430 |
| 4 | ZHOU K Z, WU F Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31 (5): 547- 561. |
| 5 |
CETINDAMAR D, PHAAL R, PROBERT D Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: a framework for technology management activities. Technovation, 2009, 29 (4): 237- 246.
doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.004 |
| 6 |
WU W W, YU B, WU C How China’s equipment manufacturing firms achieve successful independent innovation: the double helix mode of technological capability and technology management. Chinese Management Studies, 2012, 6 (1): 160- 183.
doi: 10.1108/17506141211213915 |
| 7 |
LIU Y X, WU W W, GAO P B, et al Exploring the different combinations of technological capability and technology management capability in different stages of new product development. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 181012- 181021.
doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2959207 |
| 8 |
COOPER R G What’s next?: after stage-gate. Research-Technology Management, 2014, 57 (1): 20- 31.
doi: 10.5437/08956308X5606963 |
| 9 |
DREJER A The discipline of management of technology, based on considerations related to technology. Technovation, 1997, 17 (5): 253- 265.
doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(96)00107-1 |
| 10 | National Research Council. Management of technology: the hidden competitive advantage. Washington, D.C., U.S.: National Academy Press, 1987. |
| 11 |
LIAO S S Technology management methodologies and applications: a literature review from 1995 to 2003. Technovation, 2005, 25 (4): 381- 393.
doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.08.002 |
| 12 |
PHAAL R, FARRUKH C J P, PROBERT D R A framework for supporting the management of technological knowledge. International Journal of Technology Management, 2004, 27 (1): 1- 15.
doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2004.003878 |
| 13 |
KANG T, BAEK C, LEE J D The persistency and volatility of the firm R&D investment: revisited from the perspective of technological capability. Research Policy, 2017, 46 (9): 1570- 1579.
doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.07.006 |
| 14 | AYDIN H Market orientation and product innovation: the mediating role of technological capability. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2020, 24 (4): 1233- 1267. |
| 15 |
WU J Cooperation with competitors and product innovation: Moderating effects of technological capability and alliances with universities. Industrial Marketing Management, 2014, 43 (2): 199- 209.
doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.002 |
| 16 |
MA Q, WU W W, LIU Y X The fit between technology management and technological capability and its impact on new product development performance. Sustainability, 2021, 13 (19): 10956.
doi: 10.3390/su131910956 |
| 17 | LIU Y X, WU W W, WANG Y The impacts of technology management on product innovation: the role of technological capability. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 210722- 210732. |
| 18 | COOPER R G, SOMMER A F Agile-Stage-Gate for manufacturers: changing the way new products are developed integrating agile project management methods into a Stage-Gate system offers both opportunities and challenges. Research-Technology Management, 2018, 61 (2): 17- 26. |
| 19 |
ERNST H, HOYER W D, RUBSAAMEN C Sales, marketing, and research-and-development cooperation across new product development stages: implications for success. Journal of Marketing, 2010, 74 (5): 80- 92.
doi: 10.1509/jmkg.74.5.080 |
| 20 | GENC E, DI BENEDETTO C A Cross-functional integration in the sustainable new product development process: the role of the environmental specialist. Industrial Marketing Management, 2015, 50 (10): 150- 161. |
| 21 |
TROY L C, HIRUNYAWIPADA T, PASWAN A K Cross-functional integration and new product success: an empirical investigation of the findings. Journal of Marketing, 2008, 72 (6): 132- 146.
doi: 10.1509/jmkg.72.6.132 |
| 22 |
SONG X M, PARRY M E The R&D-marketing interface in Japanese high-technology firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1992, 9 (2): 91- 112.
doi: 10.1111/1540-5885.920091 |
| 23 |
POLES R System dynamics modelling of a production and inventory system for remanufacturing to evaluate system improvement strategies. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 144 (1): 189- 199.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.003 |
| 24 | RUUTU S, CASEY T, KOTOVIRTA V Development and competition of digital service platforms: a system dynamics approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 117 (4): 119- 130. |
| 25 |
WU D D, KEFAN X, HUA L, et al Modeling technological innovation risks of an entrepreneurial team using system dynamics: an agent-based perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2010, 77 (6): 857- 869.
doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.01.015 |
| 26 | HSIEH Y H, CHOU Y H Modeling the impact of service innovation for small and medium enterprises: a system dynamics approach. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2018, 82 (3): 84- 102. |
| 27 |
YEON S J, PARK S H, KIM S W A dynamic diffusion model for managing customer’s expectation and satisfaction. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2006, 73 (6): 648- 665.
doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.05.001 |
| 28 | SCHWEITZER F, ZHANG Y, CASIRAGHI G Intervention scenarios to enhance knowledge transfer in a network of firms. Frontiers in Physics, 2020, 8 (9): 382. |
| [1] | Weiwei WU, Qian MA, Yexin LIU, Ying YANG, Suzhen YUE. Evolution of technology management system based on self-organization theory [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32(6): 1439-1449. |
| [2] |
Weiwei Wu, Bo Yu, and Jian Wang.
Dynamic models of technology management capability development based on knowledge diffusion [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 22(2): 228-237. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
