|1||HO W. Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 186 (1): 211- 228.|
|2||VAIDYA O S, KUMAR S. Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 169 (1): 1- 29.|
|3||STAN L, CONKLIN W M. Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 137 (1): 110- 122.|
|4||TSENG T Y, LIN S W, HUANG C L, et al. Inconsistency adjustment in the AHP using the complete transitivity convergence algorithm. Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2006, 2808- 2812.|
|5||XU Z S, WEI C P. A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 116 (2): 443- 449.|
|6||CAO D, LEUNG L C, LAW J S. Modifying inconsistent comparison matrix in analytic hierarchy process: a heuristic approach. Decision Support Systems, 2008, 44 (4): 944- 953.|
|7||ERGU D, KOU G, PENG Y, et al. A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 213 (1): 246- 259.|
|8||PEREIRA V, COSTA H G. Nonlinear programming applied to the reduction of inconsistency in the AHP method. Annals of Operations Research, 2015, 229 (1): 635- 655.|
|9||XU Y, WANG H. An eigenvector method based consistency improving procedure for fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2017, 33 (3): 1491- 1503.|
|10||ASHKAN N. Optimizing consistency improvement of positive reciprocal matrices with implications for Monte Carlo analytic hierarchy process. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2018, 124, 113- 124.|
|11||KOU G, ERGU D, SHANG J. Enhancing data consistency in decision matrix: adapting Hadamard model to mitigate judgment contradiction. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 236 (1): 261- 271.|
|12||YUEN K K F. Pairwise opposite matrix and its cognitive prioritization operators: comparisons with pairwise reciprocal matrix and analytic prioritization operators. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2012, 63 (3): 322- 338.|
YUEN K K F. The primitive cognitive network process in healthcare and medical decision making: comparisons with the analytic hierarchy process. Applied Soft Computing, 2014, 14, 109- 119.
|14||FAN Z P, XIAO S H. The consistency and ranking method for comparison matrix with linguistic assessment. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2002, 22 (5): 87- 91.|
|15||GASS S I. Tournaments, transitivity and pairwise comparison matrices. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1998, 49 (6): 616- 624.|
|16||DU D F. Graph theory in operations research. Beijing: Beihang University Press, 1990.|
|17||SIRAJ S, MIKHAILOV L. A heuristic method to rectify intransitive judgments in pairwise comparison matrices. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 216 (2): 420- 428.|
|18||XU Z S. Incomplete complementary judgment matrix. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2004, 24 (6): 91- 97.|
WU S H, XIE J, LIU X D, et al. A marginal optimization method to improve the inconsistent comparison matrix in the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 28 (6): 1141- 1151.
|20||KOU G, LIN C S. A cosine maximization method for the priority vector derivation in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 235 (1): 225- 232.|
SAATY T L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 15, 234- 281.
|22||CHU A T W, KALABA R E, SPINGARN K. A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 1979, 27 (4): 531- 538.|
SRDJEVIC B. Combining different prioritization methods in the analytic hierarchy process synthesis. Computer and Operation Research, 2005, 32 (7): 1897- 1919.
|24||CRAWFORD G, WILLIAMS C. A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1985, 29 (4): 387- 405.|
|25||WANG Y Y, CHEN P, SU Y. A new algorithm to find all elementary circuits of a directed graph. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2008, 36 (4): 12- 15.|
|26||WU S H, LIU X D, JIA Y L, et al. New optimization method to improve the inconsistent comparison matrix in the analytic hierarchy process. Control and Decision, 2016, 33 (11): 2106- 2112.|
|27||SAATY T L. Decision-making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 145 (1): 85- 91.|
BENÍTEZ J, DELGADO-GALVÁN X, IZQUIERDO J, et al. Improving consistency in AHP decision-making processes. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2012, 219 (5): 2432- 2441.
KWIESIELEWICZ M, VAN UDEN E. Inconsistent and contradictory judgements in pairwise comparison method in the AHP. Computer and Operation Research, 2004, 31 (5): 713- 719.
|30||XU Y, WEN X, ZHANG W. A two-stage consensus method for large-scale multi-attribute group decision making with an application to earthquake shelter selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2018, 116, 113- 129.|
|||Zhicai ZHANG, Li CHEN. Analysis on decision-making model of plan evaluation based on grey relation projection and combination weight algorithm [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 29(4): 789-796.|
|||Shihui Wu, Jiang Xie, Xiaodong Liu, Bo He, Minxiang Yang, and Zhengxin Li. Marginal optimization method to improve the inconsistent comparison matrix in the analytic hierarchy process#br# [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 28(6): 1141-1151.|
|||Shengheng Liu, Tao Shan, Ran Tao, and Yue Wang. Liveness evaluation of multi-living agent system [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 24(3): 435-.|