SE-DEA-SVM evaluation method of ECM operational disposition scheme

doi:10.23919/JSEE.2022.000058

Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 600-611.doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2022.000058

• SYSTEMS ENGINEERING • Previous Articles Next Articles

SE-DEA-SVM evaluation method of ECM operational disposition scheme

Luda ZHAO¹(), Bin WANG^1,^2,*(), Jun HE¹, Xiaoping JIANG¹()

¹ College of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei 230037, China
² Third Interdisciplinary Center (HeFei), National University of Defense Technology, Hefei 230037, China

Received:2021-02-04 Online:2022-06-18 Published:2022-06-24
Contact: Bin WANG E-mail:zhaoluda@nudt.edu.cn;49584951@qq.com;xiaoping.jiang@nudt.edu.cn
About author:|ZHAO Luda was born in 1992. He received his B.S. degree in radar countermeasures engineering from the Electronic Engineering Institute of the PLA, China, in 2015. He is currently a M.S. candidate with the Electronic Engineering Institute, National University of Defence Technology. His research interests include ECM operational analysis, combat mission planning, ECM effectiveness analysis, and modeling evaluation. E-mail: zhaoluda@nudt.edu.cn||WANG Bin was born in 1977. He received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in military operations research from the Electronic Engineering Institute of the PLA, in 1998, 2001, and 2004, respectively. He is currently an associate professor with the Department of the Third Interdisciplinary Center, National University of Defence Technology, Heifei, China. He is the deputy director of the Third Interdisciplinary Center of the National University of Defense Technology. His current research interests include operational planning, military operations research, effectiveness evaluation, modeling and simulation. E-mail: 49584951@qq.com||HE Jun was born in 1963. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in military operations research from the Electronic Engineering Institute of the PLA, in 1984, 1987, and 1991, respectively. He is currently a professor with the Department of Operational Commanding, National University of Defence Technology, Heifei, China. His current research interests include operational planning, military operations research, effectiveness evaluation, modeling and simulation. E-mail: 824717863@ qq.com||JIANG Xiaoping was born in 1987. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in control science and engineering from Harbin Institute of Technology, in 2010 and 2012, respectively. He received his Ph.D. degree in computer science and operations research from University of Nottingham, in 2020. He is currently a research fellow with the Department of Operational Commanding, National University of Defence Technology, Heifei, China. His current research interests include logistics optimization, heuristic algorithm, automatic control, traffic logistics, and scheduling. E-mail: xiaoping.jiang@nudt.edu.cn
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Military Postgraduate Funding Project (JY2019C055) and Hunan Province Postgraduate Scientific Research Innovation Project (CX20200029).

Abstract

Abstract:

Operational disposition of electronic countermeasures (ECM) is a hot topic in modern warfare research. Through fully analyzing the characteristics and shortcomings of the traditional operational disposition scheme, a super-efficient data envelopment analysis support vector machine (SE-DEA-SVM) method for evaluating the operational configuration scheme of ECM is proposed. Firstly, considering the subjective and objective factors affecting the operational disposition of ECM, the index system of operational disposition scheme is established, and we explain the solution method of terminal indexs. Secondly, the evaluation and algorithm process of SE-DEA-SVM evaluation method are introduced. In this method, the super-efficient data envelopment analysis (SE-DEA) model is used to calculate the weight of index system, and the support vector machine (SVM) method combined with the training samples of evaluation index is used to obtain the input-output model of evaluation value of combat configuration. Finally, by an example (obtaining five schemes), we verify the SE-DEA-SVM evaluation method and analyze the results. The efficiency analysis, comparison analysis, and error analysis of this method are carried out. The results show that this method is more suitable for military evaluation with small samples, and it has high efficiency, applicability, and popularization value.

Key words: electronic countermeasures (ECM), operational disposition, plan evaluation, super-efficiency data envelopment analysis (SE-DEA), support vector machine (SVM)

Luda ZHAO, Bin WANG, Jun HE, Xiaoping JIANG. SE-DEA-SVM evaluation method of ECM operational disposition scheme[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 33(3): 600-611.

Figures/Tables 14

Fig 1

Table 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Table 2

Table 3

Fig 5

Table 4

Fig 6

Fig 7

Table 5

References 33

1	Military Committee of the Army. Military language of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. Beijing: Military Science Press, 2011.
2	HOU B E, TIAN H D, GAO Y Safety assessment method of shipborne anti-torpedo weapon system based on Fuzzy-AHP. Firepower and Command Control, 2019, 44 (11): 102- 106.
3	ZHANG C K, LIU J G, CHANG W T, et al. Selection of communication system based on fuzzy modified DEA. Proc. of the IEEE Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference, 2016: 103 − 106.
4	YANG S L, ZHANG C, WANG P, et al. Integrated decision making framework for weapon application under uncertain environment. Proc. of the IEEE 7th Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference, 2014: 468 − 472.
5	HOU L, LIU X W, HE M Research on configuration optimization of communication jamming equipment based on rough DEA theory. Fire Control & Command Control, 2013, 38 (6): 81- 84.
6	ZHENG G J, REN J, LI Z P Evaluation on radar network performance based on improved BP neural network model. Journal of Air Force Early Warning Academy, 2019, 33 (2): 116- 120.
7	ZHAO P J, LI J G, LI H X Optimization of troops maneuver deployment for key-point air defense based on memetic algorithm. Fire Control & Command Control, 2018, 43 (9): 25- 29.
8	ZHAO P J, LI J G. Deployment optimization of air defense force deployment based on memetic algorithm. Proc. of the IEEE 29th Chinese Control And Decision Conference, 2017: 5538 − 5543.
9	WEN B Q, WANG T, CHENG K, et al End-defense force optimization deploymeot method based on PSO-GA hybrid algorithm. Journal of Sichuan Ordnance, 2019, 40 (11): 45- 49.
10	CHEN C, JIE C, ZHANG C M. Deployment optimization for air defense based on artificial potential field. Proc. of the IEEE 8th Asian Control Conference, 2011: 812 − 816.
11	ZAK M, BUCKA P Decision making process and the algorithm of air combat simulation. Review of the Air Force Academy, 2009, 16 (2): 87- 93.
12	DENG G M, ZHOU X G, FENG B S, et al Research of troop disposition of carrier-based anti-submarine airplane based on game theory. Fire Control & Command Control, 2017, 42 (4): 63- 66.
13	RAWAT P S, DIMRI P, SAROHA G P Virtual machine allocation to the task using an optimization method in cloud computing environment. International Journal of Information Technology, 2020, 12 (2): 485- 493. doi: 10.1007/s41870-018-0242-9
14	RAN J P, ZHAO S H, WANG X Research on optimization strategy of centralized controller deployment in airborne information network. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science & Technology, 2020, 14 (6): 966- 974.
15	QIAO Y, DAO T K, PAN J S, et al Diversity teams in soccer league competition algorithm for wireless sensor network deployment problem. Symmetry, 2020, 12 (3): 445. doi: 10.3390/sym12030445
16	FENG D J, LIU J, ZHAO F, et al. Electronic warfare and evaluation. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology Press, 2018.
17	CID-LOPEZ A, HORNOS M J, CARRASCO R A, et al Linguistic multi-criteria decision-making model with output variable expressive richness. Expert Systems with Applications, 2017, 83, 350- 362. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.049
18	YAO J, HUANG Q W, WANG W P. Adaptive human behavior modeling for air combat simulation. Proc. of the IEEE/ACM 19th International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications, 2015: 100 − 103.
19	JIAO S, LI W E I, MA P, et al The simulation evaluation system for weapon operational effectiveness based on knowledge management. International Journal of Modeling, Simulation, and Scientific Computing, 2013, 4 (4): 1350020. doi: 10.1142/S1793962313500207
20	IBANEZ J S, GARRATON M C, MECA A S A literature review of DEA efficiency methodology in defence sector. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 2020, 33 (3): 381- 403.
21	COOK W D, SEIFORD L M Data envelopment analysis (DEA)–thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 192 (1): 1- 17. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.032
22	TAVANA M, IZADIKHAH M, DI C D, et al A new dynamic range directional measure for two-stage data envelopment analysis models with negative data. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2018, 115, 427- 448.
23	NADERI S, DAROUDI S, BATOUYI S Providing a new three stage data envelopment analysis model (DEA) in fuzzy environment. Journal of Data Envelopment Analysis and Decision Science, 2018, 2018 (2): 16- 29.
24	SALEHI V, VEITCH B, MUSHARRAF M Measuring and improving adaptive capacity in resilient systems by means of an integrated DEA-machine learning approach. Applied Ergonomics, 2020, 82, 102975. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102975
25	KWON H B, MARVEL J H, ROH J J Three-stage performance modeling using DEA–BPNN for better practice benchmarking. Expert Systems with Applications, 2017, 71 (4): 429- 441. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.11.009
26	MIRZAEI M R, AFSHAR KAZEMI M A, TOLOIE ESHLAGHY A An efficiency measurement and benchmarking model based on tobit regression, GANN-DEA and PSOGA. International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting, 2019, 3 (12): 79- 93.
27	HUANG C, DAI C, GUO M A hybrid approach using two-level DEA for financial failure prediction and integrated SE-DEA and GCA for indicators selection. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2015, 251, 431- 441. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.11.077
28	WANG L X, WANG A Q, HUANG Z X Parameter inversion of rough surface optimization based on multiple algorithms for SVM. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 36 (5): 577- 585.
29	LI H J, LU Q P. K-CV parameter optimization method in the application of SVM classification data. Proc. of the IEEE 2nd International Conference on Big Data Analysis, 2017: 25 − 29.
30	VISHWANATHAN S V M, MURTY M N. SSVM: a simple SVM algorithm. Proc. of the IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2002, 3: 2393 − 2398.
31	SHALEV-SHWARTZ S, SINGER Y, SREBRO N, et al Pegasos: primal estimated sub-gradient solver for SVM. Mathematical Programming, 2011, 127 (1): 3- 30. doi: 10.1007/s10107-010-0420-4
32	SEIFORD L M, ZHU J Sensitivity analysis of DEA models for simultaneous changes in all the data. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1998, 49 (10): 1060- 1071. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600620
33	MOZAFFARI M R, GERAMI J, JABLONSKY J Relationship between DEA models without explicit inputs and DEA-R models. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2014, 22 (1): 1- 12. doi: 10.1007/s10100-012-0273-4

Metric	Expression level
Metric	high (++)	higher (+)	medium (?)	Lower (×)	Low (××)
Interval range	(0.8,1]	(0.6,0.8]	(0.4,0.6]	(0.2,0.4]	(0,0.2]

Index	Case 1	Case 2	Case 3	Case 4	Case 5
A₁₁	0.4230	0.6500	0.2546	0.3463	0.3453
A₁₂	0.0100	0.1700	0.9400	0.1900	0.6100
A₁₃	0.1200	0.2300	0.1500	0.2100	0.2900
A₂₁	0.1800	0.4800	0.1700	0.0700	0.1800
A₂₂	0.1200	0.1200	0.0200	0.2800	0.0940
A₂₃/W	9800	1100	5300	1500	9000
A₃₁	0.9800	0	0.7000	0.7200	0.9800
A₄₁	0.2600	0.2700	0.5500	0.1400	0.3700
A₄₂	0.4000	0.4200	0.6200	0.3500	0.5500
A₄₃/s^?1	0.3000	0.3200	0.8300	0.1500	0.9500
A₄₄/m	2800	400	4200	5000	4600
A₅₁	0.1200	0.1200	0.0200	0.2800	0.0940
A₅₂	0.1800	0.4800	0.0700	0.2700	0.1800

Index	Case 1	Case 2	Case 3	Case 4	Case 5
A₁₁	0.4259	1	0	0.2319	0.2294
A₁₂	0	0.1720	1	0.1935	0.6452
A₁₃	0	0.6471	0.1765	0.5294	1
A₂₁	0.2683	1	0.2439	0	0.2683
A₂₂	0.3846	0.3846	0	1	0.2846
A₂₃/W	1	0	0.4828	0.0459	0.0919
A₃₁	1	0	0.7143	0.7347	1
A₄₁	0.2927	0.3170	1	0	0.5609
A₄₂	0.1852	0.2593	1	0	0.7407
A₄₃/s^?1	0.1875	0.2125	0.8500	0	1
A₄₄/m	0.5217	0	0.8261	1	0.9130
A₅₁	0.3846	0.3846	0	1	0.2846
A₅₂	0.2683	1	0	0.4878	0.2683

Case	Relaxation variable $ S^ + $													$S^-$	$\theta $
Case	$S_1^ + $	$S_2^ + $	$S_3^ + $	$S_4^ + $	$S_5^ + $	$S_6^ + $	$S_7^ + $	$S_8^ + $	$S_9^ + $	$S_{10}^ + $	$S_{11}^ + $	$S_{12}^ + $	$S_{13}^ + $	$S^-$	$\theta $
1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1.214
2	0.55465	0.76000	2.45000	15.2000	112	1.27000	1.39000	0.34000	0.34000	1.75000	0.05000	0.85000	1450	0	0.991
3	0.54230	0.71000	2.43000	15.6000	127	0.80000	0.60000	0.28000	0.28000	0.64000	0.04000	1.92000	1065	0	1.051
4	0.48050	0.15000	2.61000	17.6000	121	1.06000	0.51000	0.31000	0.31000	0.04998	0.06000	1.58000	1295	0	0.847
5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1.169

Compare items	DEC-CCR	DEC-BBC	SE-DEA	SE-DEA-SVM
Absolute error	?0.012	0.010	?0.004	?0.001
Semantic level	+	+	++	++
Fault freedom	×	×	√	√

SE-DEA-SVM evaluation method of ECM operational disposition scheme

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

Share this article

Figures/Tables 14

References 33

Related Articles 11

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Songtao LIU, Zhenshuo LEI, Yang GE, Zhenming WEN. Automatic radar antenna scan type recognition based on limited penetrable visibility graph [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32(2): 437-446.
[2]	Tao WAN, Kaili JIANG, Jingyi LIAO, Yanli TANG, Bin TANG. Detection and recognition of LPI radar signals using visibility graphs [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 31(6): 1186-1192.
[3]	Degui YANG, Buge LIANG, Dangjun ZHAO. Cross-eye gain distribution of multiple-element retrodirective cross-eye jamming [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 29(6): 1170-1179.
[4]	Rui Zhang and Min Zhang. SAR target recognition based on active contour without edges [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 28(2): 276-281.
[5]	Fei Gao, Jingyuan Mei, Jinping Sun, Jun Wang, Erfu Yang, and Amir Hussain. Target detection and recognition in SAR imagery based on KFDA [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 26(4): 720-.
[6]	Qing Wu, Leyou Zhang, and Wan Wang. New family of piecewise smooth support vector machine [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 26(3): 618-625.
[7]	Shaoming Zhang, Fang He, Yunling Zhang, Jianmei Wang, Xiao Mei, and Tiantian Feng. Geometric active contour based approach for segmentation of high-resolution spaceborne SAR images [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 26(1): 69-.
[8]	Zhiyu Li, Junfeng Zhang, and Shousong Hu. Incremental support vector machine algorithm based on multi-kernel learning [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 22(4): 702-706.
[9]	Sumin Zhang, Shu Li, and Donglin Su. Adaptive support vector machine decision feedback equalizer [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 22(3): 452-461.
[10]	Huanhuan Chen, Qiang Wang, and Yi Shen. Decision tree support vector machine based on genetic algorithm for multi-class classification [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 22(2): 322-326.
[11]	Shaoming Zhang, Yi Lin, Xiaohu Zhang, and Yingying Chen. Airport automatic detection in large space-borne SAR imagery [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 21(3): 390-396.